Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bailout Bill: Carbon Tax Amendment?
US Senate ^ | 10/1/08 | US Senate

Posted on 10/01/2008 8:16:29 PM PDT by Koblenz

From page 180 of the Bailout bill:


1 SEC. 116. CERTAIN INCOME AND GAINS RELATING TO IN
2 DUSTRIAL SOURCE CARBON DIOXIDE TREAT
3 ED AS QUALIFYING INCOME FOR PUBLICLY
4 TRADED PARTNERSHIPS.
5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section
6 7704(d)(1) (defining qualifying income) is amended by in
7serting ‘‘or industrial source carbon dioxide’’ after ‘‘tim
8 ber)’’.
9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by
10 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment
11 of this Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
12 SEC. 117. CARBON AUDIT OF THE TAX CODE.
13 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall
14 enter into an agreement with the National Academy of
15 Sciences to undertake a comprehensive review of the Inter
16 nal Revenue Code of 1986 to identify the types of and
17 specific tax provisions that have the largest effects on car
18 bon and other greenhouse gas emissions and to estimate
19 the magnitude of those effects.
20 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date
21 of enactment of this Act, the National Academy of
22 Sciences shall submit to Congress a report containing the
23 results of study authorized under this section.
24 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is
25 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
26 $1,500,000 for the period of fiscal years 2009 and 2010.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; carbontax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
This was in the bailout bill. Is it the beginning of a carbon tax? What does it have to do with the bailout?
1 posted on 10/01/2008 8:16:30 PM PDT by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CARBON DIOXIDE TREATED AS QUALIFYING INCOME FOR PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS.

Translation: If you own a business and you breathe, we will tax you to death.

2 posted on 10/01/2008 8:19:02 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Palin won more votes in her Wasilla Mayoral race than Biden got in his 2008 Pres run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Is the Acorn subsidy still in this bill?


3 posted on 10/01/2008 8:21:15 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

They’ll be finding all sorts of chestnuts buried in that thing for years to come. As for what it has to do with the bailout, surely you jest.

Frankly, I don’t care anymore. I’m voting straight anti-incumbent from now on. Won’t do much good, but it will still give me a tickle.


4 posted on 10/01/2008 8:21:36 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

I’m not sure but it sounds as if they are looking to count profits from carbon credit trading as income for purposes of bill.

Any lawyers out there care to interpret this for us?


5 posted on 10/01/2008 8:22:15 PM PDT by Hugin (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I have to vote for McCain for fear of Obomination.
But as far as my congress critters see my tag line
6 posted on 10/01/2008 8:27:30 PM PDT by slag (reelect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

It does’nt. I can’t believe that Republicans in the senate voted for this...


7 posted on 10/01/2008 8:29:12 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

Maybe the global environmentalists are attacking the industrialized world.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2091792/posts


8 posted on 10/01/2008 8:33:32 PM PDT by kellyrae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

Our unprincipled scumbags in Congress lack the integrity to pass one clean bill. They are all disgusting little parasites.


9 posted on 10/01/2008 8:35:08 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

10 posted on 10/01/2008 8:39:11 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

The 451 page document is a bit confusing.  The "Bailout" language is on pages 2 thru 113. Apparently they gutted another bill and replaced it with the Bailout law, along with two other bills that had already passed the Senate (but not the House). 

From what I can tell, this law that they passed tonight can be broken down into three categories, the latter two had already passed the Senate, as noted.

Page 2 - 113
DIVISION A—EMERGENCY ECONOMIC STABILIZATION

The new Bailout language

Page 113 - 261
DIVISION B—ENERGY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION ACT OF 2008

Page 261 -451
DIVISION C—TAX EXTENDERS AND ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF


Division B and C passed Senate as H.R. 6049 last week

[110th] H.R.6049 : To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] (introduced 5/14/2008)      Cosponsors (17)

Committees: House Ways and Means

House Reports: 110-658

Latest Major Action: 9/23/2008 Passed/agreed to in Senate. Status: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay. 93 - 2. Record Vote Number: 205.


11 posted on 10/01/2008 8:41:37 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Here’s the quick list of the senators who voted NO on bailout/economic rescue.

Allard (R)
Barasso (R)
Brownback (R)
Bunning (R)
Cantwell (D)
Cochran (R)
Crapo (R)
DeMint (R)
Dole (R)
Dorgan (D)
Enzi (R)
Feingold (D)
Inhofe (R)
Johnson (D)
Landrieu (D)
Nelson (FL) (D)
Roberts (R)
Sanders (I)
Sessions (R)
Shelby (R)
Stabenow (D)
Tester (D)
Vitter (R)
Wicker (R)
Wyden (D)

Tomarrow i will e-mail each and everyone of them and thank them for standing up for the constitution, capitalism and freedom.


12 posted on 10/01/2008 8:42:12 PM PDT by qman (All Islamo-fachist must die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

money for Global warming lie??


13 posted on 10/01/2008 8:45:34 PM PDT by okokie (40 days of Prayer and fasting to end abortion Sept 24-Nov 2 http://www.40daysforlife.com/splash.cfm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kempster
Is the Acorn subsidy still in this bill?

The Acorn subsidy was removed from the House bill. Still pouring through this 451 page pork barrel monstrosity...this gift from the 'Rats for the House failure to pass the original bill. It will take through the weekend to absorb all the grease from this pig trough.

14 posted on 10/01/2008 8:47:02 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Palin won more votes in her Wasilla Mayoral race than Biden got in his 2008 Pres run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

I thought all tax laws had to start in the House.


15 posted on 10/01/2008 8:50:28 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

BSCO2


16 posted on 10/01/2008 8:50:38 PM PDT by Waco ( G00d bye 0'bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

US Govt shouts, “Death to Amerika”!


17 posted on 10/01/2008 8:52:02 PM PDT by usshadley (Ever heard of The Church of the Immaculate 1st Trimester?..me neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
I thought all tax laws had to start in the House.

That's the gist of Article 1 Section 7. My son pointed that out in a text message this evening.

18 posted on 10/01/2008 9:27:52 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
WTF???

.

‘SEC. 45Q. CREDIT FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION. ‘‘(a) GENERALRULE.—For purposes of section 38, 2

the carbon dioxide sequestration credit for any taxable 3 year is an amount equal to the sum of—4

‘‘(1) $20 per metric ton of qualified carbon di-5 oxide which is—6

‘‘(A) captured by the taxpayer at a quali-7 fied facility, and 8

‘‘(B) disposed of by the taxpayer in secure 9 geological storage, and 10

‘‘(2) $10 per metric ton of qualified carbon di-11 oxide which is—12

‘‘(A) captured by the taxpayer at a quali-fied facility, and 14 ‘‘(B) used by the taxpayer as a tertiary 15

injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural 16 gas recovery project. 17

‘‘(b) QUALIFIEDCARBONDIOXIDE.—For purposes of 18 this section—19

‘‘(1) INGENERAL.—The term ‘qualified carbon 20 dioxide’ means carbon dioxide captured from an in-21 dustrial source which—22

‘‘(A) would otherwise be released into the 23 atmosphere as industrial emission of green-24 house gas, and 25

----

SEC. 117. CARBON AUDIT OF THE TAX CODE.

(a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of 14

Sciences to undertake a comprehensive review of the Inter-15 nal Revenue Code of 1986 to identify the types of and 16

specific tax provisions that have the largest effects on car-17 bon and other greenhouse gas emissions and to estimate 18 the magnitude of those effects. 19

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 20 of enactment of this Act, the National Academy of 21 Sciences shall submit to Congress a report containing the 22 results of study authorized under this section. 23

(c) AUTHORIZATIONOFAPPROPRIATIONS.—There is 24 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 25

$1,500,000 for the period of fiscal years 2009 and 2010. 26

19 posted on 10/01/2008 9:28:33 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
The American Philosophical Society was begun in the earliest years of the USA. It was indeed prestigious.

The National Academy of Science is an offshoot begun about the time of the Civil War.

The present President of the Academy is an expert on the Atmosphere etc.. and has received numerous awards in this field.

The problem I have is "the power he may have over his "fellow scientists" at the academy...and whether they are followers or leaders and "finders of truth" or "creators of truth".

Is his verdict already in?

Go to wiki for more info and see what you think.

20 posted on 10/01/2008 9:42:14 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson