Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Odd. Robert Bork’s nomination by President Reagan occurred in 1987. Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973.

Wrong again Joe. Maybe being shot at in Iraq gave Joe Biden post-traumatic stress syndrome which is affecting his memory?
1 posted on 10/02/2008 8:14:23 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

It Isn’t So Joe!


2 posted on 10/02/2008 8:15:33 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh (I cling to guns and religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I guess it is possible he was referring to a later ruling where Roe was upheld only by a 5-4 vote...although his wording is rather awkward.


3 posted on 10/02/2008 8:16:48 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I think he meant that he thought Bork would have helped overturn Roe v. Wade... that’s how I took his remark when I heard it.


4 posted on 10/02/2008 8:17:19 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Maybe he meant that Bork would rule in favor of overturning RvW should an abortion case make it to the SCOTUS?


5 posted on 10/02/2008 8:17:22 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

To be fair. I think there’s enough to nail Biden on but this isn’t it.

Maybe it’s not the most eloquent of statements but the implication, and I’m fairly certain he meant Bork would have helped to overturn Roe v. Wade.


6 posted on 10/02/2008 8:17:47 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (LET'S HAVE A BONFIRE WITH THE VANITIES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

7 posted on 10/02/2008 8:18:09 PM PDT by Zombie Lincoln ("Defeat it!" - John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Hey, I’d rather listen to nails on a chalkboard or even Hillary Clinton’s voice rather than Biden, but I’m pretty sure he meant that Bork would have favored overturning Roe v. Wade. That would be true, since Roe v. Wade is extra-Constitutional and Bork is a strict constructionist.


8 posted on 10/02/2008 8:18:31 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

To be fair, I believe he was talking about the risk of overturning Roe v wade. It was the way I interpreted his remark at the time.


9 posted on 10/02/2008 8:18:54 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I gather what Joe was saying is that if Bork was on the court that Roe vs Wade would be overruled. That being said I’ve always said that America is a lesser nation without Bork on the supreme court. I think Palin could have pounced on Biden and pointed out that the Borking of Bork was the beginning of the nastiness of the curent political atmosphere.


10 posted on 10/02/2008 8:19:13 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule (Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Rove stated that, while the media may not go after it, there are 10 specific instances that Biden is wrong on factually! Plus about 6 other instances that arguable.


13 posted on 10/02/2008 8:26:17 PM PDT by shoedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

No, I thought it was clear he meant that with Robert Bork on the SCOTUS it would have become more likely that Roe v. Wade could have been overturned or at least significantly restricted in scope.

Where he opened himself up by mentioning his “change” in understanding of how judicial nominees are confirmed is that he and Ted Kennedy and fellow Demagogues totally TRASHED all traditions of comity and deceny and respect in the nomination process. I wish Sarah Barracuda had taken the opening to discuss how Biden savaged the nomination process and wrecked the traditional respect for a President’s prerogative to appoint qualified persons. The Demagogues no longer think that a Republican’s nominees are worthy of the most elementary respect, though of course if Breyer & Ginsburg had been trashed anything like the way that Bork and Thomas were trashed then the Demagogues would have declared Civil War II.


15 posted on 10/02/2008 8:35:24 PM PDT by Enchante (America: can you seriously believe that Obama & Biden know how to "run our economy"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

I wouldn’t call that a gaffe...I knew what he meant.


16 posted on 10/02/2008 8:37:20 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Biden sure spews the BS at a rapid rate.


18 posted on 10/02/2008 8:53:42 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

He obviously meant he’s prevented Roe v. Wade from being overturned — and he has, which makes him a lousy interpreter of the costitution and a moral monster.


19 posted on 10/02/2008 8:59:29 PM PDT by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson