Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bullish

Too harsh for me?

No, that’s not the point and never was.

No one wants the GOP to take off the gloves and start smacking the DNC around more then I, but when it’s done the way Morris did it, the message gets lost in the delivery.

Skillfully and tactfully shredding someone with words and facts when done right is an art form and a thing of beauty when done right.

Morris lost his composure and started with the name-calling and immature behavior.

That’s an example of how not to do it.

Hannity gave an example of doing it the right way.

Colmes is a DNC shill and when cornered his does what all debaters of limited skills do, and that is recite talking points.

That’s the level of his intellectual depth, and Morris sank to and below Colmes’ level.

Personally, I think he should apologize to Colmes for the personal attacks and insults, but not for the point he made.

Morris could have just said something like “Alan, we can disagree, but the fact that you’re constantly parroting talking points instead of debating facts is just proof you have no legitimate argument to make and don’t have the facts on your side.”


147 posted on 10/02/2008 10:00:55 PM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield ("Obama Girl" will soon need consoling. I'll take one for the team & volunteer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney Dangerfield
Hannity gave an example of doing it the right way.

I've watched Dick Morris do it 'the right way' with Colms a dozen times.

Colms is unable to take a hint. He kept working hard and long for a real swat upside the head.

Tonight, Dick finally did do it the right way.

151 posted on 10/02/2008 10:10:23 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed the Republicans with stupid political enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Rodney Dangerfield
Morris could have just said something like “Alan, we can disagree, but the fact that you’re constantly parroting talking points instead of debating facts is just proof you have no legitimate argument to make and don’t have the facts on your side.”

WEAK!
152 posted on 10/02/2008 10:12:16 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson