Replies

Ouch! Great ad. Powerful.

1 posted on 10/03/2008 3:40:42 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound

To: Retired Greyhound

2 posted on 10/03/2008 3:43:55 PM PDT by CaraM

To: Retired Greyhound

What an evil, evil man.

4 posted on 10/03/2008 6:47:49 PM PDT by Heartland Mom (Those who would give up liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Franklin)

To: Retired Greyhound

It's actually far worse than merely opposing medical treatment for children born alive following an abortion attempt. What BArack Obama was seeking to protect was a method for killing alive unborn children--killing by abortionists, thus a twisted way to kill without doing so inside the woman's body--which was growing more popular for two reasons (according to court testimony in a hearing regarding the abortion procedure in another state).

Obama pled that he was trying to protect Roe v Wade. The ad is focused on the wrong truth. The real truth is, the IL bills were aimed at stopping the abortion method using forced prematyure delivery then neglecting the born alive child until he or she dies ... Obama was trying to protect this infanticide under the guise of 'failed abortions must not be used to assault "a woman's right to choose".' But the truth that he was actually trying to prevent the outlawing of this new way to kill the alive unborn is what folks are missing.

And given that he was trying to protect infanticide being used under the guise of a woman's right to choose abortion, given the thing Obama knew he was trying to protect (not the born alive children), we may rightly discern he was trying to protect infanticide from being outlawed in Illinois.

5 posted on 10/03/2008 6:57:56 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)

To: Retired Greyhound

7 posted on 10/03/2008 7:01:03 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)

To: Retired Greyhound

This may seem like a hair splitting point, but it is not hair splitting. I'm afraid the ad focuses upon the smoke and mirrors the Obama campaign has put out. The bills in IL were actually trying to stop a growing way to kill unborn children by forcing premature delivery.

Here's why this is confusing for some. Gianna Jessen, more than thirty years ago, survived a saline scalding abortion attempt on her life and was born prematurely. The abortionist had tried to kill her in utero.

What the IL legislative body was trying to stop was a new method for killing 'unwanted' children, by merely stretching the cervix and inducing premature delivery, then beglecting these born alive infants until they die. The very act of forcing premature birth then killing by neglect IS INFANTICIDE, and Barack Obama was trying his darndest to protect this new evil killing method.

10 posted on 10/03/2008 7:07:49 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)

To: Retired Greyhound; narses

Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm

12 posted on 10/04/2008 3:20:10 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)

To: Retired Greyhound

"Speak for my silent voice. Please don't let Obama control my destiny."

13 posted on 10/04/2008 5:31:02 AM PDT by Elvina (Pray to end abortion.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794