Posted on 10/05/2008 4:48:42 PM PDT by PowerPro
Note: This essay was preceded by Cashill's 3-part WND.com series: "Did Bill Ayers Write Obama's 'Dreams.'"
A steady attack on the white race . . . served as the ballast that could prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into an ocean of despair.
Barack Obama, Dreams From My Father
Shortly before launching his career, first as a community organizer and then as a radical bomber, Bill Ayers took a job as a merchant seaman.
Id thought that when I signed on that I might write an American novel about a young man at sea, says Ayers in his memoir, Fugitive Days, but I didnt have it in me.
Although Ayers has tried to put his unhappy ocean-going days behind him, the language of the sea will not let him go. Indeed, it infuses much of what he writes. This is only natural and often distinctive, as in an appealing Ayers metaphor like the easy inlet of her eyes.
Less natural is that much of this same nautical language flows through Obamas earth-bound memoir, Dreams From My Father. For simplicity sake, I will refer to the memoirs author as Obama.
Ayers is particularly eloquent when writing about the fury of the elements as, curiously, is Obama. Consider the following two passages, the first from Fugitive Days:
I picture the street coming alive, awakening from the fury of winter, stirred from the chilly spring night by cold glimmers of sunlight angling through the city.
The second from Dreams:
Night now fell in midafternoon, especially when the snowstorms rolled in, boundless prairie storms that set the sky close to the ground, the city lights reflected against the clouds.
These two sentences are alike in more than their poetry, their length and their gracefully layered structure. They tabulate nearly identically on the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), something of a standard in the field.
The Fugitive Days excerpt scores a 54 on reading ease and a 12 th grade reading level. The Dreams excerpt scores a 54.8 on reading ease and a 12 th grade reading level. Scores can range from 0 to 121, so hitting a nearly exact score matters.
A comparable nature passage from my novel, 2006: The Chautauqua Rising, scores a 61.6 with an 11 th grade reading level. The samples I submitted from my own semi-memoir on race, Sucker Punch, score in the 63-76 range.
In reading Ayers, one senses that he is unaware how deeply his seagoing affects his language. Memory sails out upon a murky sea, he writes at one point.
Indeed, both he and Obama are obsessed with memory and its instability. The latter writes of its breaks, its blurs, its edges, its lapses. He also has a fondness for the word murky and its aquatic usages.
The unlucky ones drift into the murky tide of hustles and odd jobs, he writes, one of four times murky appears in Dreams.
In Dreams, we read of the whole panorama of life out there and in Fugitive Days, the whole weird panorama.
Ayers writes poetically of an unbounded horizon, and Obama writes of boundless prairie storms and poetic horizonsviolet horizon, eastern horizon, western horizon.
I can imagine him standing at the edge of the Pacific, says Obama referring to his grandfather, his hair prematurely gray, his tall, lanky frame bulkier now, looking out at the horizon until he could see it curve.
Ayers often speaks of currents and pockets of calm as does Obama, who uses both as nouns as in a menacing calm or against the current or into the current.
As a point of contrast, the author of Obamas Audacity of Hope never uses calm as a noun and uses current almost always as an adjective to mean contemporaneous.
The difference between the two Obama books on the word current is striking. In Dreams, there are four uses of current as noun and two as adjective. In Audacity, there is one of use of current as noun and twenty as adjective.
The metaphorical use of the word tangled might also derive from ones nautical adventures. Ayers writes of his tangled love affairs and Obama of his tangled arguments. The word tangled does not appear in Audacity.
Am I suggesting that Obama used different ghostwriters for the two books? Yes, at least in part.
There is no doubt that Obama contributed to both, and for Audacity Obama could have afforded more than one writer or editor, but there is something about the sea imagery that distinguishes Dreams.
Although not necessarily related to the sea, but perhaps inspired by it, are the emotionally charged words that appear frequently in both Fugitive Days and Dreams: fierceness, fury, rage, despair, and cruelty.
(Both books, by the way, make frequent use of the colon.)
Ayers writes of another panorama, this one an immense panorama of waste and cruelty. Obama employs the word cruel and its derivatives no fewer than fourteen times in Dreams, twice as many times as in Audacity.
On at least twelve occasions, Obama speaks of despair, as in the ocean of despair cited above. Ayers speaks of a deepening despair, a constant theme for him as well.
Then, of course, there is what Obama calls a rage at the white world [that] needed no object. On this subject too one sees in Dreams a hint of the nautical in phrases like "knotted, howling assertion of self" and "withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage."
In Fugitive Days, Ayers talks of an uncontrollable rage as though it were a storm. One wonders whether the Weathermens inaugural act of mass violence, the Days of Rage, has its roots in Ayers maritime experience.
There are any number of intriguing non-nautical word connections between Dreams and Fugitive Days, but one that deserves mention is the repeated reference to lies, lying and what Ayers calls our constructed reality.
But another part of me knew that what I was telling them was a lie, writes Obama, something Id constructed from the scraps of information Id picked up from my mother.
That whole first year seemed like one long lie, Obama writes of his first year in college in Los Angeles, one of at least a dozen references to lies and lying in Dreams, a figure nearly matched in Fugitive Days.
As intriguing as these word connections are, there are some objective, data-driven ways to prove authorship, one of which goes by the name cusum analysis or QSUM.
This analysis begins with the measurement of sentence length, a highly significant and telling variable. To compare the two books, I selected thirty-sentence sequences from Dreams and Fugitive Days, each of which relates the authors entry into the world of community organizing.
Fugitive Days averaged 23.13 words a sentence. Dreams averaged 23.36 words a sentence. By contrast, the memoir section of Sucker Punch averaged 15 words a sentence.
More to the point, the 30-sentence sequence that I pulled from Audacity averages more than 29 words a sentence and clocks in with a 9th grade reading level, three levels below the earlier cited passages from Dreams and Fugitive Days.
To do a complete QSUM analysis requires skill and software beyond my proverbial pay grade. My thanks to those who have gotten me this far. The intro to QSUM and the Flesch analysis, as well as the pdfs of Audacity and Dreams, have all come courtesy of WND readers.
If anyone knows someone capable of taking the analysis the next step, please contact me through my website, cashill.com. Most such scholars reside within the universities, and that scares me.
One final subjective note about the introductory quote. As a writer, especially in the pre-Google era of Dreams, I would never have used a metaphor as specific as ballast unless I knew exactly what I was talking about.
Seaman Ayers obviously did.
Below is the preceding WND.com series: Did Bill Ayers Write Obama's "Dreams"?":
* Part I: Did Bill Ayers write Obama's "Dreams"? * Part II: Deconstructing the Text * Part III: Why it Matters
When this was purportedly written, what the hell did Obama know about "prairie storms"?
He had spent less than a year in Chicago. And almost six months in Bali.
Something is very much awry...
Send that to Jack. Forward any ideas you have or contacts that might be helpful to Jack at Cashill.com.
And help get some attention to this! I think this is the case of “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” and I personally feel it’s extremely relevant if his book was ghost written by a terrorist who wanted to position a politically viable candidate of his own choosing into a leadership role.
Hmmm....constructed reality....constructed reality ...Where have i heard that term before...
OH Yeah!...Here >> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1
Wouldn’t Bill Ayers have better things to do than write a book for a kid who he was mentoring? Wasn’t he busy in those days, finding funding for his commie projects and building Chicago political power? I find it unlikely, myself. Obama was paid to write a book on race relations, it took him forever to do it, and when he finally finished it, it was all about himself, the only thing he knew anything about. I would not be surprised if he asked his friend Ayers to read it before it was finalized, but I would be surprised if a lazy commie hippie living on OPM would actually spend the time to write the book for the Obama kid, even if he did like him.
You're right, except for the timing. The book came out after Obama made is Senatorial move and was no longer a kid being mentored.
I guess the first question is whether Obama had someone ghostwrite the book. Given the absense of other writings and speed he wrote two books, ghostwriting appears likely.
If the above is true, then who was the ghostwriter? Was it Ayers? Ayers has shown that he can vomit out text, so he probably could have done it.
Why would Ayers write the book? I don't know. Money for the cause? To help Obama and thus, advance the cause? Again, I don't know.
Did Ayers write it? Again, I don't know. I've seen some style indicators that suggest it might be possible. It would certainly help if we could get a look at other things written by Obama, but there are none.
Herein lies one of the big problems many of us have with Obama. We know next to nothing about the person who may become the next leader of the free world. We know more about the GOP VP candidate after a few weeks of media frezied searching, but nothing about Obama. And yet, there are far more questions about Obama.
McCain does not seem like the type of person to push a strong opposition research effort, leaving the vetting up to the media. Unfortunately, the media are not at all curious in learning more about Obama's past and instead seem to focus on explaining away the questions (e.g., J.Wright, Rezko, Ayers, Alinski, Fannie Mae, etc.).
http://americanissuesproject.org/
Bill Ayers ad here to distribute.
These folks have gone through intimidation and harassment from team Obama.
on hannity’s show tonight it sounded like a cozy little neighborhood there. ayers, khalid, farrakhan, obamas, rezko.
god if W had had a neighborhood like this he would have been buried in an avalanche of shit.
Obama is Ayers path to power. The man behind the scenes, suggestion here, advice there.
I think it took him a long time, and it wasn't what he was paid to write, but he finally got it out. He probably had people help him finalize it, but having been editor of Harvard Law Review, even a bad one, he would know how to edit a story.
Someone as saavy as Ayers might have suggested to him that he leave out the part about the coke and the commie mentor and the hating whitey stuff, if he was so sure that Obama would be such a future star.
What you say is true, except the protege has outgrown the mentor. Ayers is smart enough to understand that if his creation succeeds, he cannot have anything to do with Ayers.
Would the Publisher of the book write checks to both Obama and his ghost writer? Or would the check go to Obama and he would write a check to Ayers? There’s a paper trail somewhere.
Radicalism is the life blood of places like Hyde Park. Ayers would do it in a heartbeat.
Sounds highly unlikely to me. Some evidence would be nice.
No proof. I used to live in Hyde Park - it’s just a feeling...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.