Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf

Because the polls lie — we know it and he knows it. His lead is not even close to that if there is a lead.

No one comfortably in front is going to go back to the early 90’s and bring out Keating 5 which will give Sen McCain a chance to bring out where his passion for slalshing pork from the budget started.

McCain is in Obama’s head and that of his campaign. Gotta love it. Since Obama went back to the early 90’s then I am sure he won’t mind Republicans bringing up when he first hooked up with Ayers, Acorn, and the like in the late 80’s!

As for Rezko, sounds like he is trying to cut a deal with the US Attorneys and yes I believe it could cause major problems for Obama.


10 posted on 10/05/2008 8:28:48 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom

Right. If the Obama campaign was as confident in their position at this point as the various talking heads are then they’d just laugh it off and focus on their message of the week.

The Keating Five is old, old news, and at the end of the day, McCain was found not to have done anything wrong.

Meanwhile, associating with a known and unrepentant terrorist over a decade, working closely with him on the board of a foundation, and using his support to launch your political career speaks to one’s judgement. It also, IMO, speaks to one’s patriotism, or lack thereof. Keating Five is about old inside Washington baseball. Ayers is about who exactly Obama is and what his core beliefs might be.

McCain’s experience with Keating Five made him vigilant about campaign finance and ethics in general and led to McCain-Feingold. Obama’s really done nothing with Ayers other than trying to downplay the relationship and then the tepid ‘throw under the bus’ routine.

Keating Five is really a weak response as the question the Ayers relationship raises is about whether or not Obama really cares about this country as he says he does or whether he harbors the kind of feelings towards this country that Ayers does.

It also makes Obama appear desperate to change the subject. If Ayers isn’t that important, why are you so ready to go nuclear (as if Keating 5 is so) at the mere mention of your relationship with him? Methinks someone protests too much.


35 posted on 10/05/2008 8:39:25 PM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson