Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
No, it's because Palin makes us look like the slackers we mainly are. We've had our bit of success, but we've also spent a lot of time smelling the roses. We've gone back to school to get another degree, volunteered in poor countries, devoted ourselves to a sport or a hobby. We've not had kids, or if we have, we've had one or two, and we've had nannies paid for by our work or our husbands or our inherited money.

For all her navel-gazing I think the author is on to something here.

4 posted on 10/07/2008 1:59:23 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rummyfan

Notice this, in general,

that wealthy libs (”elite”) didn’t have to work very hard for what they have.

Again, I’ll state - wealthy libs haven’t had to work hard for what they have. Otherwise, they’d be conservatives.


65 posted on 10/07/2008 5:41:10 AM PDT by MrB (0bama supporters: What's the attraction? The Marxism or the Infanticide?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson