[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for posting that as it was the exact picture that popped in my mind! Four weeks to the election and just now CNN has figured out there is extensive ties. What changed? Ratings in the tank? All those emails accusing CNN of lying?

[Blue Turtle]

This is a very good report...very damaging to Obama. McCain should bring this up tonight.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

I watched Lou Dobbs on CNN get very angered at the Obama bias. He was a CNN watchdog.

Campbell Brown is so in the tank for Obame she might as well put Obama on her forehead.

[holden]

What changed?

Perhaps the One's campaign got behind on paying their advertising invoices.

Sure, he's raked in $422 mil, but to get people to keep lying their butts off for you ain't cheap!

HF

[DannyTN]

"Four weeks to the election and just now CNN has figured out there is extensive ties. What changed? "

Sarah Palin mentioned it.

[Calamari]

Look for the Clinton's fingerprints some where in this story.

Hillary can't allow Obama to win this election because she would be 69 years old after 8 years of Obama.

Her last best shot would be to go after Palin if McCain does not seek a second term or an even older McCain if he does seek a second term.

Of course, this supposes that she still wants to be President of the United States.

[Lady Heron]

Either their loss of credibility among the American public is finally starting to get to them or there are a few Hillary democrats at CNN realizing that the extreme left takes over the party if Obama is elected... there is a split between the old guard and the new in that party that has not been explored as of yet.

[JrsyJack]

"Four weeks to the election and just now CNN has figured out there is extensive ties. What changed? Ratings in the tank? All those emails accusing CNN of lying?"

Clinton said it was time to show the youngster the price of messing with Hillary's presidency.

[Amntn]

“Four weeks to the election and just now CNN has figured out there is extensive ties. What changed?”

This doesn’t smell right to me. Is CNN doing this to change the subject? Do they want to preempt something even more damaging? I don’t trust them to ever do a damaging story on a democrat without an ulterior motive.

Maybe they think the Fannie and Freddie connection is more damaging to O and want to keep the conversation away from it.