Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
But it would be highly offensive if in attempt to break the trainees down, they chose to use anti-Semitic, racist or ethnic slurs.

Why? Oh yeah, this is the new sensitive Army. Long ago they'd use anything about you in order to tear you down. It wasn't actually about your religion, race, origin, height, or the size of your nose -- no discrimination on anything but the soldier you were becoming.

5 posted on 10/08/2008 1:57:18 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat; All
Not really. There has been a severe quality problem with the Army DI program for the past couple of years, a lot of it based upon stresses imposed by those who had served in Iraq and those who had not.

My close buddy went through Basic and then AI training at Fort Benning (Infantry) last summer. He was very knowledgeable about the Army and knew a great deal about the training process before he ever left home, due to the prior service of several of his family members and friends.

After he finished up, he told me that the quality of his DIs varied greatly, from first rate to outright incompetent. Moreover, apparently there was some kind of internal peeing match going on between those DIs who had served in the Sand Box and those who had not, resulting in clear acrimony among them.

Not kosher. Morale in the training companies plummeted because of it, and there was about a 66% loss rate in my pard's outfit (he was one of the one's who made it).

True story.

13 posted on 10/08/2008 2:46:49 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson