And don't forget, when the time comes, the ones running in the near future, like Tom Coburn, who is running in 2010:
http://www.coburnforsenate.com/20040613pressrelease.shtml
The POTUS will probably still be picking judicial nominees after 2010.
I’ve been screaming about this all summer. Where in the hell is talk Radio with the Candidates running? Have they forgotten what is at stake?
BTTT
Dump All Rinos!!!!!and their democrat allies!!!
You mean the ones who voted YES for the bailout?
I’ll be voting against Saxby Chambliss. And I will be truly sorry if that gives the Rats a super majority; but I WILL NOT VOTE for a man after he defies the will of his constituents.
Gang of Ten energy bill + Massive gooberment socialist takeover (”bailout”) = loss of my vote.
Yeah, lets not... If they voted for the bailout throw them out too!
Surely we can all find a Republican who is running for the U.S. Senate that we DO like, and support them.
Check them out:
http://archive.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/senate_2008
They don’t have to be in our state in order for us to support them.
Saxby Chambliss in GA was running away with it until he voted on the cow-patty. Now mega-lib-progressive Jim Martin is tied with him. I’d like to stick it to Chambliss, but won’t because I know Martin from working in GA politics and he’s a judicial nightmare. http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm
Help out a Repub.
I don’t see a supermajority for the Democrats, even in my worst nightmares. I’m expecting them to pick up 5, maybe 6 seats. But they’ll lose one when they boot Lieberman from their caucus. Congress is harder, maybe a pickup of 12 to 15 at the outside. All depends on how the Democrats who won traditionally Republican seats in 2006 do in their first run for reelection.
