Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama And The Oracle Of Omaha
IBD Editorials ^ | October 9, 2008

Posted on 10/09/2008 5:45:08 PM PDT by Kaslin

Election '08: Why would a man linked with the Wall Street culture Barack Obama hates top his list for Treasury chief? Obama knows something many don't about billionaire Warren Buffett.


Despite his storied investing prowess, Buffett is a liberal who sees eye-to-eye with Obama on economic policy. That's why he's contributed $4,600 to Obama's campaign — along with $28,500 to the DNC — and not a dime to John McCain or Republicans during this election cycle.

During the Nashville debate, Obama put forth an ideological litmus for the Treasury job, a post that has taken on even more importance amid the financial meltdown. He said he would want to make sure the next secretary shares his views on improving tax fairness and income redistribution.

"The key is making sure the next Treasury secretary understands that it is not enough just to help those at the top," he said. Buffett, the so-called Oracle of Omaha, would make a "good choice" for the job, Obama said. That left some observers scratching their heads.

But in Obama's 2006 memoir, he recounts visiting with Buffett at his office in Omaha, Neb. And if Obama's account can be believed, Buffett told him he endorses his plan to soak the rich. "If there's class warfare going on in America, my class is winning," Buffett lamented, while striking other notes discordant with his capitalist image.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bo; democrat; ibd; obama; warrenbuffett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2008 5:45:08 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Warren Buffet thinks there should be ZERO POPULATION GROWTH.....which means, to a liberal like him, that YOU have TOO MANY KIDS......His kids are OK to live, but not other kids. He is DISGUSTING.


2 posted on 10/09/2008 5:47:17 PM PDT by Ann Archy (AbortiDUH!!!on.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If there’s a total collapse of the world economy Warren won’t be any richer than anyone else.


3 posted on 10/09/2008 5:47:25 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

White, wealthy guilt.


4 posted on 10/09/2008 5:48:03 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Buffett told him he endorses his plan to soak the rich. "If there's class warfare going on in America, my class is winning," Buffett lamented....

Well, Buffett should be real patriotic and give up 90% of his wealth for the socialist cause....

5 posted on 10/09/2008 5:48:31 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Buffet on Obama is like calling the plumber to come fix your TV


6 posted on 10/09/2008 5:51:44 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Really big business’s that are friends with the socialist dictators really do well in the NEW economy. The little guys are the ones who disappear.
So if you want to be successfull in the NEW Osbama economy..invest where Warren does. This is how the rich stay rich in those places like Mexico. What an economic model!


7 posted on 10/09/2008 5:54:44 PM PDT by Oldexpat (Drill Here, Drill There..we must drill everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“When you get rid of the estate tax,” he told Obama, “you’re basically handing over command of the country’s resources to people who didn’t earn it.”

Maybe it’s just me, but nothing galls me more than the death tax. I think it’s immoral to tax individuals twice, even after they are dead.

This guy may be a financial wizard, but he aion’t got his head right.


8 posted on 10/09/2008 5:56:42 PM PDT by incredulous joe ("God, Guns and Babies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


THE JAWA REPORT - blog: "How a Young Chicago Litigator Helped Create the Subprime Housing Crisis" (October 9, 2008)

Link



[Post no. 5] - ARCHIVES - Topic: BIDEN & OBAMA (aka B & O) (October 9, 2008 -- Click Here.)

9 posted on 10/09/2008 5:58:04 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, I couldn’t believe it when McCain gratuitously praised Buffett during the last debate.

I don’t remember his exact words, but when he was asked whom he would name as Treasury Secretary, he said something to the effect that Obama’s adviser Warren Buffett would be just great.


10 posted on 10/09/2008 6:01:14 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I once had great respect for Buffett as a Capitalist and successful business man.

But now the libs trot him out, the richest man in the world, to tell us we need to pay more taxes. What a hypocrite.

I have a small business, with only a few employees. I already write big checks every year to the FED and State Governments. I don’t pay myself much more than my employees. Obama probably will say I am “rich” and I do not accept the BS about how 95% us will pay less taxes (most now will get money back).

Buffett the political pawn can get stuffed.


11 posted on 10/09/2008 6:02:52 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Buffett reminds me of Bertrand Russell. Russell was a genius at math (as Buffett has been in stock picking), but Russell’s philosophical output was trash (as Buffett’s political views are trash).


12 posted on 10/09/2008 6:03:57 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why don’t Warren Buffet and Bill Gates just GIVE their friggin billions to all the “working poor” and relieve themselves of all that guilt?


13 posted on 10/09/2008 6:06:06 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
But now the libs trot him out, the richest man in the world, to tell us we need to pay more taxes.

You're forgetting the cake. We may eat cake.

14 posted on 10/09/2008 6:09:56 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("[Obama acts] as if the very idea of permanent truth is passe, a form of bad taste"-Shelby Steele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

Giving it to the government makes NO sense. They certainly didn’t earn it, can’t be trusted to spend it wisely and will defintely waste it.


15 posted on 10/09/2008 6:10:36 PM PDT by bfree (liberalism is the enemy of freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
If there’s a total collapse of the world economy Warren won’t be any richer than anyone else.

On the contrary, for years Buffet has been lamenting the overly high value of many stocks. He prefers to buy and hold stocks, but he has been less willing to buy them during the past decade because of those high values.

He's been waiting for times like this when he can buy stocks of good quality companies at extremely cheap prices.

16 posted on 10/09/2008 6:12:24 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Warren Buffet has won and wants his legacy to rule forever.

The way the wealthy retain control is by holding down those that may have the means to get wealthy.

Warren like others in the wealth class have their wealth in instruments that are never taxed but they hold out a fraction of fraction of a fraction as ‘income’ as Warren does as a farce. His ‘salary’ is a farce but his power is as a billionaire’s billionaire. And if one day there would be too many billionaires, then Warren and his calss would be trillioinaires.

One way the wealthy escape the definition of ‘income’ is by forming a charitable trust that they control, then taking out a mega-billion dollar insurance policy against it and then borrowing against the policy. This type of scheme completely escapes significant tax liability. But to make it work one has to be wealthy to begin with. In other words, it’s only for the wealthy.

Therefore according to the wealthy, taxes are really only for those that threaten the ruling class. When you view tax laws through this lense, you will wake up to the fact that tax code is not so much about revenue as it is about setting a barrier to those that might amass enough financial power to change the rules, and the wealthy will have none of that.

This characteristic of human classes of holding the affluent down is not new, It goes very far back. And it transcends many cultures, Oriental as well as Western. The rich trading classes and land barons of the present and the past must all be subjugated to the ruling class of which Buffett is an example of the present.

To level the playing field one must destroy the present tax code. H.R. 25 ‘The FairTax’ is the means to level the playing field and take away the ruling power of the wealthy who pay to keep the tax code in their favor to the detriment of those that might be competitive to their interests.

And you will witness an onslaught of disinformation and smears whenever any group attempt to discuss H.R. 25. What you are witnessing is a protection of the current code and the vested interests behind it.


17 posted on 10/09/2008 6:16:04 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

A liberal giving up his wealth? You can’t be serious


18 posted on 10/09/2008 6:19:45 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

“...Warren Buffet thinks there should be ZERO POPULATION GROWTH...”


Yes. And he is a very generous contributor to
Planned “Parenthood” as well as RU 486 research, and various population control foundations, and contributed to
research for a portable abortion machine.

Warren Buffet is a perfect fit for Obama’s circle of advisors.



19 posted on 10/09/2008 6:21:31 PM PDT by biscuit jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He pays no dividends at Berkshire
20 posted on 10/09/2008 6:25:05 PM PDT by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson