The easy counter to the “sustainability” argument is that socialism is inherently unstable and inefficient, and thus is unsustainable.
It is unable to provide what it promises, and continually demands more resources to provide less functionality. In addition, socialists seem to lack pattern recognition, treating the failure of socialism with pseudo-religious denial instead of objectively revising failed theory.
Ironically, socialism matters more to socialists than solving any problem. In fact, they demonstrate indifference and even hostility to any means of reform, repair, or improvement that does not conform to their doctrines.
As such, socialism is almost the very definition of “unsustainable.”
now you’re cooking with Crisco! I can agree with this logic wholeheartedly... only self-actualized individualism can be sustainable... keep this thread going!
It’s also the virtual definition of “Moral Hazzard” which just creamed our unsustainable mortgage madness due to the Communutty Redevelopment Act signed by Jimmy “the peanut head” Carter, Janet “the man” Reno of Clinton infamy and now by Barney “JuicyFruit” Frank and Nancy “stretch” Pelousie!!!