Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS/NYT Poll: Obama Opens 14-Point Lead (Here we go again)
http://cbs3.com/topstories/presidential.poll.cbs.2.840297.html ^

Posted on 10/14/2008 3:58:57 PM PDT by davek70

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 next last
To: Interesting Times

No weasling away needed. Zogby even had Gor up in his last poll and he was infact correct. Gor did win the popular vote.

Elian Gonzalez tripped him up in Florida and Jeb was able to protect his little bro. Jews for Buchanan helped.

Whole lots of luck.


241 posted on 10/14/2008 5:53:45 PM PDT by The_Republican (Conservatives are in trouble because they hate Scarlett Johanson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
I beg you, don't duel with The_Republican.

He dropped down from a higher league!

242 posted on 10/14/2008 5:54:01 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
No weasling away needed. Zogby even had Gor up in his last poll and he was infact correct. Gor did win the popular vote.

What Zogby said is not relevant to your claim.

Elian Gonzalez tripped him up in Florida and Jeb was able to protect his little bro. Jews for Buchanan helped.

We weren't talking about any of that. You are trying again to squirm away from the original topic.

You said that a Republican has to win the popular vote by 3% to win the election. Yet Gore won the popular vote outright in 2000, and still lost. This flatly disproves your statement.

Do you have the honesty to admit you were mistaken?

243 posted on 10/14/2008 6:03:32 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swiftboating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Name calling shows the limitations of your vocabulary and intellect. Thanks for playing.

Be honest. I didn't call you a name.

I said, accurately enough, that your statement was idiotic.

244 posted on 10/14/2008 6:05:25 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swiftboating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
He dropped down from a higher league!

... after he lost his fastball...

245 posted on 10/14/2008 6:07:52 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swiftboating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Listen 536 votes was it? It was an odditty. W’s goose was cooked, he got very lucky. End of story.


246 posted on 10/14/2008 6:07:57 PM PDT by The_Republican (Conservatives are in trouble because they hate Scarlett Johanson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Listen 536 votes was it?
247 posted on 10/14/2008 6:11:08 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
CBS lies worst then NBC !
248 posted on 10/14/2008 6:11:50 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Listen 536 votes was it?

Obviously, you don't understand the concept of Grammar.

249 posted on 10/14/2008 6:12:57 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Listen 536 votes was it? It was an odditty. W’s goose was cooked, he got very lucky. End of story.

In 2000, Al Gore received 50,999,897 votes, or 48.38% of the popular vote.

George W. Bush received 50,456,002 votes, or 47.87% of the popular vote.

In other words, Bush received almost exactly 3.5% less than you said a Republican must have to win a presidential election.

Are you ready to admit your mistake yet, or would you prefer to change the subject some more?

250 posted on 10/14/2008 6:20:38 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swiftboating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

Do you have Party ID Data from polls conducted over the last six months?


251 posted on 10/14/2008 6:30:24 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: kesg

That would be good data if you were conduction a poll in 2006 but it does not reflect party ID data for 2008.


252 posted on 10/14/2008 6:32:31 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Not on me but I know from watching them they have generally ranged from Dems +5 to Dems +18.

What I do know is this, Historically going back to 1996, the Dem's have never had more then a 4 point advantage. 2006 was an extremely bad year for Republicans but they only outvoted us by 2 points. I think they will definitely have a higher advantage this year, but I have not seen any evidence that they will outvote us by more then they did in 2000 or 1996.

The fact is, we won't know until election day. In 2004 polls were figuring a 3 point Dem advantage, we ended up tieing with the deems.

My best guess is we will see a 40D-36R-24I turn out.

253 posted on 10/14/2008 6:57:20 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

You see, the lesson here is for you.

Bush went in ahead in polls, except Gore was closing in.

Bush’s problem was that he didn’t have enough margin to protect against Gor surge.

He got lucky in Florida.

So ofcourse EVs got him the Presidency, but the probability of that phenomenon ocurring now is almost none.

As a matter of fact there is NO WAY IN HELL that McCain wins the popular vote.

His best hope is like 5-6 recounts and squeezing out 500 vote victories in 6-7 States.

After riots are over, I am sure he would have a chance to settle down in his new Presidency.


254 posted on 10/14/2008 7:07:17 PM PDT by The_Republican (Conservatives are in trouble because they hate Scarlett Johanson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

If anything your example supports my point.

Conventional wisdom besides Zogby was that Bush was ahead by point or two.

Instead he got beat in popular vote.

Which is why I am saying that now more than ever when the Dem ground game is at its peak and they have registration and resources advantage, for McCain to win, he really needs to by up by at least 3.

Otherwise, he won’t win popular vote and oddity like 2000 is unlikely to repeat.


255 posted on 10/14/2008 7:10:41 PM PDT by The_Republican (Conservatives are in trouble because they hate Scarlett Johanson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: davek70

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Anyone that buys this is dumber than a box of rocks.


256 posted on 10/14/2008 7:14:02 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
Every single poll taken by or on behalf of broadcast media has jacked the "independent" or "not affiliated" percentage up beyond anything reasonable. That way they isolate the Bradley effect folks (white Democrats who say they'll vote for a black candidate but don't) with the RINOs (white Republicans who say they'll vote for a regular Republican, or McCainiac, but don't).

The objective is to get those anti-Obama Democrats out of the Democrat column.

257 posted on 10/14/2008 7:15:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

Good.


258 posted on 10/14/2008 7:16:21 PM PDT by moose2004 (Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill And Then Drill Some M,ore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

No, they are based on subjective decisions, nice try.


259 posted on 10/14/2008 7:18:05 PM PDT by moose2004 (Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill, Drill And Then Drill Some M,ore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Please tell me how you would design a sample frame. Would you attempt to match your sample frame to current Census Tract data and if so would you weight any populations within the population?

How would you account for any populations that were under represented?

Would you look at Party ID Data from the last 20-30 years, look at party ID Data from the last 3-6 months or would you disregard all previous party ID Date?

What would be your sample size?

What MoE would you find acceptable?

What Response Rate would you aim for?


260 posted on 10/14/2008 7:37:18 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson