By 'Little' I assume he means none.
The jackass is complaining that the bailout gives money to the banks and he wants to give money to the people.
Does he not understand the purpose of banks or is he deliberately lying to his ignorant supporters.
Money to the banks means money for all of us. We live on credit for all sorts of things.
Homes, cars, building materials for construction, etc.
Those that expect Baraq Hussein mohammed 0bama to “reach across the aisle” may be surprised that he’ll do it only to smack them up side the head! He has no history of doing it, and no intention of doing it!
If the election goes as the media says in their polls there will not be a requirement to reach over the aisle. The left radicals will have taken over and our nation will be gone had been a great time for us and the world but the following years will be back to dictatorships and burning of the Constitution.
On the questions of
- life
- taxes
- gun rights
- protecting troops and America, and all other issues,
why not list and use each candidate's past votes as the best indicator of their future actions?
Words are cheap and easy.
Past actions are prologue to likely future behavior!
Let’s face it, this turd is not the Messiah. He is more like the antichrist. He should be nowhere near the presidency.
In the last 2 years, Republicans comprised only 13% of O’Bombers co-sponsors. Dems comprised 55% of McCain’s. McCain is for greater diversity.
Not surprisingly, none of O’Bomber’s sponsored legislation has ever made it into law.
I recently saw Obama on the news saying something to the effect that people needed to get the Republicans to support the bail-out bail-out bill, but he wasn’t the guy because he can’t work with Republicans.
If anyone can find that clip (my preliminary search efforts have not yielded it), I think it would be a great service to post it here, or on its own thread.