To: 2CAVTrooper
The best thing to do would be to incorporate RAM coatings, and retrofit other components such as redesigned tail fins using radar transparent carbon composites, canopies, inlets, etc. This will require a fraction of the engineering and flight testing.That is basically what I meant. There are numerous "add-ons" and small, non-airframe related changes that can be made to increase capability and decrease radar cross section. But I would not think that an F-16 could withstand the abuse that an aircraft designed for carrier landings does without major modifications.
23 posted on
10/16/2008 8:54:52 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat. And so is Obama.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Ok, I was thinking along the lines of new airframes.
25 posted on
10/16/2008 8:58:12 AM PDT by
2CAVTrooper
(GO SOX! Squish the Fish!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
LM actually offered a carrier capable variant of the F-16.
26 posted on
10/16/2008 8:59:55 AM PDT by
2CAVTrooper
(GO SOX! Squish the Fish!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson