Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2CAVTrooper
The best thing to do would be to incorporate RAM coatings, and retrofit other components such as redesigned tail fins using radar transparent carbon composites, canopies, inlets, etc. This will require a fraction of the engineering and flight testing.

That is basically what I meant. There are numerous "add-ons" and small, non-airframe related changes that can be made to increase capability and decrease radar cross section. But I would not think that an F-16 could withstand the abuse that an aircraft designed for carrier landings does without major modifications.

23 posted on 10/16/2008 8:54:52 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat. And so is Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

Ok, I was thinking along the lines of new airframes.


25 posted on 10/16/2008 8:58:12 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (GO SOX! Squish the Fish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

LM actually offered a carrier capable variant of the F-16.


26 posted on 10/16/2008 8:59:55 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (GO SOX! Squish the Fish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson