Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Couldn't Be Cleared
The American Spectator ^ | 10.17.08 | George H. Wittman

Posted on 10/17/2008 5:37:59 AM PDT by vietvet67

The lowest-ranking enlisted persons in the Armed Forces of the United States who are expected to handle sensitive matters in the scores of jobs involving classified equipment or written material must be investigated before obtaining their security clearance. Could Barack Obama gain such a clearance?

To begin, the clearance applicant would have to complete a detailed personal history form that includes, if necessary, government access to all health and education files. This is the starting point of all security investigations. Top Secret clearance involves a field investigation rather than the Secret version that is usually limited to a "name check" that is a basic police and public information file review. For the TS clearance an investigator will visit the home neighborhoods and work place sites of the applicant in search of supportive and/or derogatory references.

If the clearance is extended further into the handling of information of such importance that it requires a compartmented distribution, the field and document investigation is pursued with considerable vigor over a lengthy period of time. Nuclear and other sensitive technical or political matters fall into this category.

In all cases, whether on the lower level or up to the most sensitive intelligence, the background of the applicant's personal and business involvement forms the nucleus of the initial phase of the investigation. The people with whom the applicant associates lead the investigator to personal connections and matters relative to the individual's character, beliefs and past acts appropriate to matters of security.

Eligibility for clearance at all levels is directly influenced by the people with whom one associates. Yes, who your friends are and have been does count -- a great deal. This is true, of course, in many types of police investigations where suspicion is adequate reason for further inquiry.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: background; clearance; nationalsecurity; obama; secret; security; topsecret
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2008 5:37:59 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Related...

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2008/10/barack-obama-couldnt-pass-routine.html


2 posted on 10/17/2008 5:38:55 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Obviously. I know of someone who was interviewed because someone they know needed a clearance. The investigator interviewed everyone in this person’s past. The process took months.


3 posted on 10/17/2008 5:44:59 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (My new favorite quote "You can't organize clutter.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
This is a joke, right? Does the writer really believe that security rules would be followed in granting The One the highest level security? The Dem congress would immediately pass a law exempting The One from any such scrutiny.

IN my most cynical moments I wish that Obama and a 60 Dem senator congress win. The things they'd do would drive most of the country wild with anger. Think Dumpsterunderground and Daily psyKOSis are bad? As the new Dem government imposes "The Fairness Doctrine," we'd see an explosion of other technologies that would keep conservatives in touch and furious. 2010 and the Dem congress would be just a bad memory.

4 posted on 10/17/2008 5:46:27 AM PDT by pabianice (Inexplicable and infuriating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

When I was going through the drill to get my clearance in the 70’s for the army, I had a “glitch” that slowed things up. It seems that when I was in high school, one of my “associates” was arrested for protesting the war in a rally at Cal State Fullerton in 1970. They wanted to know the extent of our friendship. (I think we went surfing a couple of times during high school, but I never launched a campaign out of his house nor was i on a political board with him)But that fact that i knew him almost disqualified me. The FBI acted like this was the end of the world for me. Imagine the field day they would have with Obama. No birth certificate, voter fraud, terrorist friend, friends with criminals, etc.


5 posted on 10/17/2008 5:46:29 AM PDT by realcleanguy ("I have not yet begun to fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

My first 2 jobs required Top Secret clearances with DoD. It took 6 months and a pile of paperwork. I can imagine that DoD, the FBI, CIA, and other alphabet bureaucrats are as scared as hell what will happen to their jobs when Zero gets into office.

Zero will turn this country upside down. My guess is he won’t last past the first 100 days.


6 posted on 10/17/2008 5:48:24 AM PDT by DownInFlames (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

he’ll need that birth certificate


7 posted on 10/17/2008 5:49:29 AM PDT by RDTF (BO smells and eventually people do what's necessary to avoid it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

When they were reviewing my records for my clearance, they left no stone unturned. The investigators questioned everyone, and I do mean everyone, they pulled my High School Science Teacher and Mentor out of the middle of class, they questioned the 85 year old lady who was my neighbor, my friends and their friends.

Getting a TS is no joke, if I had a friend who...I don’t know killed someone or was a terrorist, I’d be lucky if they let me clean the latrines, much less anything sensitive.


8 posted on 10/17/2008 5:51:11 AM PDT by PVT4evr (OIF 07-08 3ID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

IIRC, there are questions on the application for security clearance that ask specifically, if one has ever been involved with subversive groups against the United States. I’m not sure that Obama could say that he hasn’t.


9 posted on 10/17/2008 5:55:59 AM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: PVT4evr

My TS was held up for 8 months.
My step brother had gone to the USSR on a class trip(Russian language) and my father has some business dealings with the China. When MI and the FBI came to talk to my Dad he’d thought I been killed when he saw the Gov. car pull up in the driveway and Army officers got out.


11 posted on 10/17/2008 6:02:17 AM PDT by elder5 (Reelect ROSSI '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Read this post.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2097121/posts?page=10#10


12 posted on 10/17/2008 6:03:37 AM PDT by George Smiley (Palin is the real deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Actually BHO would not pass the security requirements to be a member and play in the Marine Corps Band because it plays at the White House.


13 posted on 10/17/2008 6:04:55 AM PDT by Freeper (Remote Space is not that Remote. If you could drive your car straight up - it's only an hour away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

My first 2 jobs required Top Secret clearances with DoD. It took 6 months and a pile of paperwork.

With Iraq and the ‘stan going on, takes a good bit longer than that now to get cleared, my friend.


14 posted on 10/17/2008 6:05:05 AM PDT by George Smiley (Palin is the real deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
Election to the office of President by the People of the United States is the highest form of clearance there is.

The people who vet applicants and give out security clearances are not superior to the People, and they work for and at the pleasure of the President.

This line of reasoning is ridiculous.

15 posted on 10/17/2008 6:07:54 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When He rolls up His sleeves, He ain't just puttin' on the Ritz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

That right there should disqualify him from being POTUS.


16 posted on 10/17/2008 6:08:00 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Thanks to the robber barons in D.C. and on Wall St. I've been forced to become a minimalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
The Dem congress would immediately pass a law exempting The One from any such scrutiny.

No they wouldn't.

Any "law" which purports to restrict or impair the President's Article II powers is facially unconstitutional.

No exemption is necessary. The Office of President IS an exemption, by definition.

17 posted on 10/17/2008 6:10:02 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When He rolls up His sleeves, He ain't just puttin' on the Ritz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Let’s not forget Obama’s trip to Pakistan when he was in college, and the two Pakistani’s he lived with for two years during that time..... add to that his relationship with that Communist in Hawaii.....

And his admitted cocaine use.... we’re not even talking about all of the shady characters he worked with when he was a community organizer....

Obama would clearly fail any background check for security clearance.....

By the way.... Lt. Col. Allen West brought this up a few days ago, and Michael Steele mentioned it on Hannity and Colmes the other night:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100606/posts


18 posted on 10/17/2008 6:32:44 AM PDT by Fox_Mulder77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

I was interviewed regarding a friends daughter who was going to USAF Flight School. They asked character questions, finances, did I know her friends, etc.


19 posted on 10/17/2008 6:33:02 AM PDT by Lobbyist (I want my American dream!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

Yep. I was interviewed for a security check for a friend of my son. The friend was applying to be a USMC Embassy Guard. The interview was not contentious but they certainly asked in a variety of formats, whether there was anything in his past that would cause me to question his allegiance and integrity.


20 posted on 10/17/2008 6:34:42 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson