Replies

Yeah, sure.

Just like Hussein Obama shares his wealth with his brother who lives in a third-world country, in poverty, on about $12 a year.

If Hussein really believed in spreading HIS wealth around, don’t you think he’d help with own flesh and blood?

No, he wants to spread other people’s wealth around.

To "spread the wealth' most of it doesn't even have to be confiscated with taxes. Money creation is a useful tool to accomplish that end without even "raising taxes." If the rulers double the stock of money by giving out the new money to the "reliable" elements it reduces the value of the assets held by the other part of the populace by half. Most of that new money will go to drug dealers-social allies- and to the government banks. The government thereby gets that value back in mortgage interest and foreclosures. Foreclosures don't have to be a taking of the property, merely an assumption of title so that government becomes landlord to the reliable portion of the population and can put several families or whatever mix it chooses into the properties. "We have title now and you can't afford the rent so we are assigning a certain number of homeless people and others to share your quarters." Then double the stock of money again and further reduce the assets of the producing unreliables. Then, democratically by stages, the country becomes reduced to a small stratum of Party functionaries and rulers who control almost all of the diminishing assets of the nation and a great mass of proletarians in declining circumstances who must more and more rely on government for their very survival.

That is if it all goes smoothly without interference from the fellows in Teheran and Riyadh who just might complicate things a bit, not to mention those folks over there in China and the frustrated empire centered in Moscow.

And if this guy is truly a Saracen in Democrat clothing it won't save him or us.