Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berg: "Obama & DNC Admit all Allegations"
America's Right ^ | Tuesday, October 21, 2008 | Philip Berg

Posted on 10/20/2008 9:44:03 PM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: slag

It sounds to me like his laywers have been trying to get him to sign the original answers to the requests for admissions and he had to fly to Hawaii to secretly deal with this case, so he is using the excuse of a sick family member.

I don’t doubt that someone is sick, but I doubt he would otherwise tkake time out from his schedule to spend $150 million.


41 posted on 10/20/2008 10:14:49 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

Whoa! Is that true?? His kids have never met granny Madelyn?


42 posted on 10/20/2008 10:15:13 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
Link to Berg's Motion to be Filed Tuesday Oct 21st:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SP1e1v9SEpI/AAAAAAAABJE/ICBQ2KKK9f8/s400/10-21+Motion.bmp

43 posted on 10/20/2008 10:15:30 PM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA (McCain/Palin - Maverick Reformers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: no dems
If he is disqualified, his supporters (especially the Black voting bloc) will be so depressed and demoralized they will not even bother showing up at the polls to vote, and you can begin the practice of saying “President McCain”.

BINGO!

44 posted on 10/20/2008 10:17:40 PM PDT by OneHun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: no dems

No, they should not.You dont want this laid at the feet of republicans.Let the clintons do it.We just need to be real careful that we dont get tarred with this.


45 posted on 10/20/2008 10:18:21 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
OK, for those of us who are not lawyers, this sounds like its open and shut...but what are we missing?

Nothing legally, but no one will care about a "legal technicality". The Lawyers for The One, and the DNC, will stall for a couple of more weeks, and then we may very well find ourselves with a President Elect who is not Constitutionally qualified for the position. Also with President Elect Biden. (although not until the electoral college casts it's votes, until then, it's not official under the Constitution, and the "O" electors could vote for someone else, say Hillary, or Biden, or John F'n Kerry (who served in Vietnam) or even AlGore, who after all got a plurality of the popular vote. )

Could result in Interesting Times".

But I have to believe that if the evidence was there, Hillary, who wants the Presidency as a wolf wants a sheep, would have found it, and leaked it to the Republicans.

46 posted on 10/20/2008 10:19:07 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

I heard that too. That the Obambi kids never met “granny” even though they were with Barack and Michelle the last trip to Honolulu this summer.


47 posted on 10/20/2008 10:22:11 PM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA (McCain/Palin - Maverick Reformers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Do US judges upon their swearing in have to take the oath of office and swear on to protect the Constitution of the USA ? and up hold the US Constitution ?

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Article IV, 3rd paragraph, Constitution for the United States.

So that would be:

YES!


48 posted on 10/20/2008 10:22:16 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
I was involved in a case (medical malpractice case) where we asked for documents and answers to written interrogatories. Plaintiff did not respond within the 30 day statutory requirement. After 45 days we petitioned for summary judgement to dismiss the case. We were denied, and the Judge, gave plaintiff another 60 days to comply with our request. I have found that disctrict court judges are the law inside their courtrooms.

Have you run into this problem?

49 posted on 10/20/2008 10:22:22 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Treeless Branch
If he served by mail obama gets an extra three days to respond.

30 days was 5 days ago.

51 posted on 10/20/2008 10:23:44 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: imahawk
No, they should not.You dont want this laid at the feet of republicans.Let the clintons do it.We just need to be real careful that we dont get tarred with this.

You're right; my bad. I really do believe the Clintons are behind this. Berg is a Democrat. I've never believed they were going to sit by and let B. Hussein destroy Hillary's chances of becoming President of the United States. She'll resurface in 2012 and cakewalk to the nomination.
52 posted on 10/20/2008 10:24:08 PM PDT by no dems ("Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice...." Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Treeless Branch
Also the court might have ordered that written discovery was not yet permitted to commence<> Filing the required timely response is not part of "discovery".

That is why the civil rules apply. There is no fifth amendment to allow a refusal to answer.

A refusal to answer questions allows the questioner to deem the answer is anything they say. The answer that is deemed to be given is binding and cannot be later denied.

53 posted on 10/20/2008 10:25:27 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Okay everyone, is this for real or is this pie in the sky? Really? I want to know if this is one of those "Dan Rather and the copy machine" moments at the FR.

Because this is some fairly scary stuff.

54 posted on 10/20/2008 10:27:35 PM PDT by Porterville (Grammar Nazis- Hands off my mistakes!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
In many many cases this happens, to the point that there is not a lot of fear among lawyers that sanctions will be imposed immediately, and normally there is great deal of delay allowed in most cases. In fact, most of them are not on time, unless there are threats to take the matter to the Judge made in advance of the deadline.

The difference between interrogatories seeking information, and requests for production of documents is that they do not have a similar impact, and the rule allowing the requests for admissions to be deemed admitted is different than those other two categories of discovery.

In the first two, the court will order the answers on pain of contempt of court, or other penalties which are also available.

55 posted on 10/20/2008 10:27:37 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
Whoa! Is that true?? His kids have never met granny Madelyn?

Wouldn't want them to have a "confused" racial identity. How to explain to the kiddies, who sat in Reverend Wright's Church too, that Granny is a "White devil", the scourge of the other races.

56 posted on 10/20/2008 10:28:32 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA

If that’s true, then it’s not a surprise that he threw his granny under the bus.


57 posted on 10/20/2008 10:29:19 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

Is grandma about to bite the dust? That is the question. Has anything every been published about her in the last two years? If his kids have never met grandma, that would be very strange indeed!! Grandma’s generally like to be involved with their heirs. We shall see.


58 posted on 10/20/2008 10:29:45 PM PDT by NewEnglander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA

I have to wonder if when he returns from Hawaii, after “visiting his ill grandmother,” he will somehow have miraculously found a certified copy of the birth certificate?


59 posted on 10/20/2008 10:30:20 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Don't you wish you had supported a conservative when you had the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slag

You do know that Hawaii is part of the country, right? LOL!


60 posted on 10/20/2008 10:31:09 PM PDT by Miztiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson