Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: padre35
Note that there is another "gotcha" here. I've seen suggestions elsewhere that the dealer should just attach a rifle stock to the receiver and then transfer the firearm as a rifle. The problem is that if the FFL has a type 01 "dealer" license versus a type 07 "manufacturer" license or type 10 "manufacturer of destructive devices" license, he has just broken the law (manufacturing w/o a license). The ATF definition of manufacturing is pretty strict.

So why don't 01 FFL's just convert to a type 07 you ask? Lots of reasons. Zoning is a big one, as a location that's good to go for retail sales (01 license) may not be ok for industrial activity (required for an 07 or 10 license) without a variance (money and attorneys required). Further, 07 and 10 licensees must pay ITAR annually to the US Dep't of State ($2250/year). Many gun dealers are scraping by as it is, and the additional fees and regulations could force them to close up shop.

18 posted on 10/22/2008 8:46:05 AM PDT by gieriscm (07 FFL / 02 SOT - www.extremefirepower.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: gieriscm

2,100 dollars is pretty expensive, the Federal Government has shed FFL licensees for years now, especially when Clinton raised the fees and chased many many FFL holders out of the business.

There were some machinist types who were making 80% receivers, I think that is one of the points behind the new regulation(?)


19 posted on 10/22/2008 8:54:45 AM PDT by padre35 (Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson