[Diogenesis]

No. The woman you show had direct impact to her eye,
with lacerations. The vic in Pitts. may have been held
down so hard, that the black eye is secondary
to rupture of facial vessels. Is that the
perp’s fingermarks on her face from her contralateral
ala extending inferolaterally?

Until evidence appears otherwise, this is unlikely
to be a hoax.

[Maverick68]

Hey, I’ve got a great idea for the MSMedia: Perhaps everytime a woman reports a rape in this country, she should face the same scrutiny as this woman! Again, I don’t care if it’s a hoax, we can file it under “fake but accurate”...

[Dick Vomer]

The vic in Pitts. may have been held down so hard, that the black eye is secondary to rupture of facial vessels. Is that the perp’s fingermarks on her face from her contralateral ala extending inferolaterally?

er.... don't think so. The blood vessels in the face can be "ruptured" but if you notice her eyes. Clear white conjunctiva. No subconjunctival hemorrhages, no petecheal bleeding around the eyes, no swelling of the lip. Maybe she cleaned up after the assault, but I've seen and been beaten and pretty much puffed up right away.

This is what I think you look for if your chest is compressed really hard or your neck squeezed till the blood pools in your head.

I just think we shouldn't go off like the Sharptons, Jacksons, lesbian, and muzzie faux victims.

There's enough cr#p I hate about libs that I don't need to make stuff up.