Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Palin softened her rhetoric - Shift, in Henderson, to message aimed at women reflects polling
Las Vegas Sun ^ | Wed, Oct 22, 2008 (2:42 p.m.) | J. Patrick Coolican

Posted on 10/23/2008 1:53:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Steve Marcus

Sarah Palin, the GOP vice presidential nominee, poses with supporters Tuesday in Henderson at a rally that produced a change in the candidate’s tone.

***********************************************

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin unveiled a new stump speech before a crowd of thousands at the Henderson Pavilion, appealing directly to women and softening her overall tone.

“It’s about time we shattered that glass ceiling once and for all,” said Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee.

And the chant went up: “Sarah! Sarah! Sarah!”

Palin offered a range of women- and family-friendly policy proposals not usually heard from Republican candidates.

She called for equal-pay-for-equal-work and more family-friendly policies such as flexible workweeks. She offered an homage to the federal law requiring that women’s collegiate sports have the same resources as men’s.

She castigated the subjugation of women abroad.

Meet Sarah Palin, feminist extraordinaire.

(Excerpt) Read more at lasvegassun.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: 2008; ayers; mccain; nv2008; obama; palin; palinattacks; swingstates; swingvote; womensvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: SierraWasp

Got to run....be back ;later...


21 posted on 10/23/2008 2:25:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys
Cry me a river.

I was part of a “club” sport, rowing on a Crew team. We financed ourselves with fund raising drives.

Our University “stole” our women's crew team to balance out some Title 9 numbers. They gave a couple of our gals scholarships and paid for their travel, but the boats (which the club paid for) were still club property; but then the women were not supposed to fund raise (and they were the best at it)!

A wrestling team needs mats and gym time. They can fund their own travel and such. Swimming team needs pools and pool time. They can fund their own travel and such.

I don't think the discrepancy in interest between women and men's sports will stand forever.

Women are greater than 50% of most Universities populations, they should have an equal opportunity to play a sport.

I think the emphasis on athletics in college is out of hand anyway. “We need a University the Football team can be proud of” is a joke.

22 posted on 10/23/2008 2:25:19 PM PDT by allmendream (White Dog Democrat: A Democrat who will not vote for 0bama because he's black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Digger

You got a problem with Title IX?


23 posted on 10/23/2008 2:29:03 PM PDT by NYpeanut (Hillary is so 2007. I need a new tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Amen. I always thought athletic scholarships amounted to welfare for the physically gifted (in high school I used to tutor the thugs on the football team, who headed to college on freebies while I paid my own freight).

What organized athletics has to do with scholarship is a mystery to me. Tossing a ton of dollars at a very few students is a waste, but as long as they're going to do it, it had better be spread in proportion to gender.

24 posted on 10/23/2008 2:40:17 PM PDT by NYpeanut (Hillary is so 2007. I need a new tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
We are in agreement. The purpose of University is to educate, not to be a farm team for the NBA or NFL.

College sports brings in a lot of money and I have no problem with them spending that money that THEY make. I don't really have much of a problem with the University giving them a free education either, but what is sauce for the gander is good for the goose as well.

Other than that, what is wrong with “club” sports? Paying your own way brings a certain satisfaction.

I was a collegiate athlete, and I paid my own way. Crew boats are not cheap. Best of all as a all volunteer Crew, most of us never having rowed before, we regularly beat the pants off all scholarship teams! SWEET!!!

25 posted on 10/23/2008 2:51:29 PM PDT by allmendream (White Dog Democrat: A Democrat who will not vote for 0bama because he's black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
"You got a problem with Title IX?"

Check with any alumni association to see how much is donated to the school because of their sports teams. Then ask for a breakdown of donations by sex.

They aren't donating because womens field hockey won the NCAA.

yitbos

26 posted on 10/23/2008 3:04:29 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (GET OUT THE VOTE !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

She has to watch it, though. It is entirely appropriate to advocate for “women’s issues.” It is another thing to do that entirely - you risk looking more like a First Lady than a Vice-President with “gravitas.”


27 posted on 10/23/2008 5:03:29 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess

28 posted on 10/23/2008 9:27:16 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I loved the part of that video where he was talking to Anderson Cooper and he said that Matthews and Olberman climaxed at the same time during Obama’s acceptance speech. Hilarious!


29 posted on 10/23/2008 9:30:12 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

So you like Government micro-managing your life? Or object to criticism of your girl-crush?


30 posted on 10/24/2008 1:58:38 PM PDT by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
So you like Government micro-managing your life?

No, and I have stopped beating my wife, BTW.

I was just noting that with a neck and neck race with a guy who will pretty much micromanage everything...

...we still have people whining like babies.

Later days.

31 posted on 10/24/2008 5:52:03 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
So you like Government micro-managing your life?

No, and I have stopped beating my wife, BTW.

I was just noting that with a neck and neck race with a guy who will pretty much micromanage everything...

...we still have people whining like babies about the GOP.

Later days.

32 posted on 10/24/2008 5:53:02 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Know your Audience!


33 posted on 10/24/2008 5:56:37 PM PDT by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking" - JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Right. Gotta have a pile of cash to pay the socialist professors to put chips in the heads of our future leaders. Cha-ching. See post 25, it is right on.


34 posted on 10/26/2008 7:43:34 AM PDT by NYpeanut (Hillary is so 2007. I need a new tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Forty-seven percent of respondents view Palin negatively, with 38 percent viewing her positively.

And I keep being told that this is not the case....because of the large crowds Palin draws. We shall see.

35 posted on 10/26/2008 7:51:20 AM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Show me why I should trust the GOP to govern in a fiscally conservative way (or even competently). The whole Palin thing is eye candy for a morally bankrupt party. If I thought they’d govern well and/or conservatively I’d give some credit. All I see is incompetence and venality


36 posted on 10/26/2008 11:57:38 AM PDT by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
The whole Palin thing is eye candy for a morally bankrupt party.

LOL! Yeah, that's the way it works. If the GOP acts like drunken sailors, they are rightly criticized. But if the nominee picks a social and fiscal conservative with a steel spine and flawless pro-life cred to be his right-hand woman, it's just a stunt. Either way, the whiners get to do what they like to do best: Whine, while the rest of us do the heavy lifting of reform.

Please, show me why voting for anyone but McCain in this election is the best thing to do for this country. If you can't, show me what your whining does to defeat Obama. Or are you one of the folks on this site who talks conservatism but dreams of The One thanking them for their vote?


37 posted on 10/26/2008 12:52:00 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

You settle for second worst. I think our country deserves better.


38 posted on 10/28/2008 5:15:03 AM PDT by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MoreGovLess
You settle for second worst. I think our country deserves better.

No, what you think is that the path Ronald Reagan chose isn't good enough for conservatives. What you think is that I'll overlook your intellectual cowardice. Put up or shut up, Princess. If you're so much more devoted to the country than me and Ronnie, you should have no trouble handling this query. Here it is again:

Please, show me why voting for anyone but McCain in this election is the best thing to do for this country. If you can't, show me what your whining does to defeat Obama.

39 posted on 10/28/2008 9:32:02 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Because voting for a kleptocrat makes you complicit in your own tyranny: it puts the handcuffs on your hands. I wouldn’t support Herod even if he is better than Caesar

If you don’t get it, I’m sorry. It’s called integrity

Besides, do you really think McCain is a conservative? Come on!


40 posted on 10/28/2008 12:39:14 PM PDT by MoreGovLess (The USA has one main political party: the Kleptocrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson