Not a lot of details here to work with. Sounds as if the apartment owners attitude needs publication so the market can work.
1 posted on
10/25/2008 5:13:54 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
It is their property but is it even legal to ban the discharge of a firearm in this manner?
2 posted on
10/25/2008 5:36:54 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(No More Obama! - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
To: marktwain
I’m not sure the landlord can force this guy to move.....this will be interesting to watch since it’s right down the road from me-—and it is Texas.
3 posted on
10/25/2008 5:37:55 AM PDT by
basil
(Support the Second Amendment-buy another gun today!)
To: marktwain
It’s LAWYER time. I’m sure the residents can find an attorney who would be glad to represent them for the publicity.
5 posted on
10/25/2008 5:53:49 AM PDT by
GoldenPup
To: marktwain
What this guy is facing doesn't sound legal and the property manager/owner is out of line (and likely not a Texas Company).
- Whatever it says in the lease it MUST comply with the Law.
- If Texas Law says this guy can own/possess and USE a weapon in self defense, the lease clause means squat as it doesn't comply with the law.
- An illegal contract entered into - even willingly - like said lease appears to be is null and void and cannot be enforced.
- Eviction in three days? Bull. Thirty days is the standard, I can't see Texas being different.
All that said, this guy still needs a Lawyer ASAP but prolly can't afford one. He's still screwed. Caveat, 'if' gubmint section eight is involved, may be a new ballgame.
I'm not an attorney, but I've played one in court.
6 posted on
10/25/2008 6:33:25 AM PDT by
Condor51
(The only difference between Bill Ayers and Timothy McVeigh is the body count!)
To: marktwain
I’d at least investigate whether someone was using muscle to encourage the residents to leave as part of a larger plan.
9 posted on
10/25/2008 6:44:38 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: marktwain
His apartment lease included a clause stating residents are not allowed to own or discharge guns on the premises If I lived in these apartments, I would plan on moving ASAP.
Nothing like advertising your renters are are prey for thugs
11 posted on
10/25/2008 6:47:40 AM PDT by
Popman
(Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
To: marktwain
Looks like Landera is owned/run by .....
The Alliance Residential Company
Looks to me, considering how big a pain in the butt it is to get info, that they're fairly picky about who lives there.
13 posted on
10/25/2008 6:59:59 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: marktwain
Looks like it’s owned by Landera Realty LP, which is a front for northern interests.
C/O HARVEST EQUITIES INC
1831 CHESTNUT ST STE 702
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
14 posted on
10/25/2008 7:00:41 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: marktwain
Check the eviction laws.
I’ll bet he can stay put for 30 to 60 days.
18 posted on
10/25/2008 7:13:01 AM PDT by
G Larry
(BarackÂ’s character has been molded by extremists)
To: marktwain; sit-rep; Squantos; Eaker; Joe Brower; SLB
Did the tenant ever year of going to court? Landlords don’t evict, courts do, after minimal legal notice, a complaint, and a court hearing, and an additional statutory period to comply with or appeal the court’s edict.
There is no such thing as a “three-day eviction.”
To: marktwain
His apartment lease included a clause stating residents are not allowed to own or discharge guns on the premises... Perhaps that's why the thieves and vandals target this particular area...
26 posted on
10/25/2008 11:21:23 AM PDT by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson