I guess that was kinda cryptic..., sorry.
What I meant was that the prophecies are the reverse of each other, in that good is bad and bad is good (hence the white is black and black is white comment). So, where the Mahdi is supposed to be “good” — he is actually “bad”. And where Israel (and Jews) are to be destroyed, they are really “saved” (at the coming of Christ).
But, aside from the “reversal” of each other, they are the same prophecies.
>>>What I meant was that the prophecies are the reverse of each other, in that good is bad and bad is good
Then i understood you correctly to begin with.
The opening post of this thread points to islamic prophesy which suggests that Obama is this Mahdi... Good guy for Islam. So the reversal would suggest that he is the Anti-Christ.
Personally, I don’t see Obama fitting the bill. According to biblical prophecy, he is of the wrong descent, and in the wrong region of the world to bring about the false peace treaty which begins the tribulation period.
Besides... if his failure to bring about a campaign which unifies the races in the US has resulted in just the opposite, how could anyone believe he is capable of negotiating a treaty between Israel and the Palestinians?
Now... my point was this... if there is no direct biblical prophecy which describes Obama to a T (which there is not), then a competing religious prophecy which does is destined to be proven wrong.
This is why i’m curious about the details of the Islamic prophesy... Does it fit our current situation to a T? Does it clearly foretell the results of this election going to Obama? If so, then the opposite must be true.
McCain will Win.