Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

The party.

This is why I’m confused about Berg’s case.

Every State ELEC office I looked up and/or into states the candidates are suppose to come to them vetted.

Philip Berg did NOT just go after Obama. His suit had two parts: 1 - Obama, qualifications questions 2 - Separate filing to the DNC for not vetting the candidate.

Berg, as a registered Democrat, has standing to file against the party.

The judge had NO RIGHT to throw out the filings against the DNC. Notice how that 2nd part stays even more out of the news than the Obama part.


25 posted on 10/28/2008 12:54:01 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Calpernia

Did you read the ‘judge’s’ opinion. Howard Dean could have written it. Pathetic.


30 posted on 10/28/2008 12:55:36 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia
Berg, as a registered Democrat, has standing to file against the party.

Just being a registered Democrat doesn't automatically convey standing, Berg needed to show an actual injury suffered by Obama's running. As the Judge Surrick outlined in his decision.

48 posted on 10/28/2008 1:04:43 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson