Skip to comments.
Obama's tax-cut threshold shrinking?: $250,000, $200,000, now $150,000
WorldNetDaily ^
| October 28, 2008
| Drew Zahn
Posted on 10/28/2008 1:22:20 PM PDT by MountainLoop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: MountainLoop
They just can’t stick to one thing.
2
posted on
10/28/2008 1:24:00 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Quiet by nature, standing tall)
To: wastedyears
It will drop to $50k shortly after election day, if they win.
3
posted on
10/28/2008 1:25:10 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: MountainLoop
It’s the old bait and switch method...keep talking Biden.
4
posted on
10/28/2008 1:25:27 PM PDT
by
Snappy1MarineMom
(Don't Blame me I voted for Keys)
To: MountainLoop
This needs to go out in a commercial and a press statement of some kind with Joe the Plumber’s words about it being 250,000 one day and then what the next
5
posted on
10/28/2008 1:25:41 PM PDT
by
volslover
To: wastedyears
The real numbers have always been $25,000, $20,000, and $15,000.
6
posted on
10/28/2008 1:26:05 PM PDT
by
GunsareOK
To: MountainLoop
7
posted on
10/28/2008 1:26:28 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
To: bamahead
It will drop to $50k shortly after election day, if they win.
And to $25K by January.
8
posted on
10/28/2008 1:26:44 PM PDT
by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes right)
To: All
Liar Obama, people need to wake up from their kool-aid stupor and see who they are really supporting here, a liar and deceiver. Thanks God that us FReepers can see through the smoke and mirrors. These are the people (sheeple) that will follow the antichrist in the end times, the ones that will be deceived-—now I can see how that could really happen-—this is just a dress rehearsal of what’s to come.
9
posted on
10/28/2008 1:28:36 PM PDT
by
LegalEagle61
(If you are going to burn our flag, please make sure you are wearing it when you do!)
To: GunsareOK
All you need to know is the break point for Social Security ~ that's where folks living on pensions and savings have to pay taxes on their Social Security income.
If you are below that point they'll give you a tax cut of about $500. If you are above that point they'll leave the tax rates and conditions unchanged from that point to about double that amount.
Folks from the doubling point on up will be taxed into penury, sent to camps, and turned into cheap, untanned leather sent to China to be turned into Gucci purses.
No one in his right mind can possibly vote for Obama.
10
posted on
10/28/2008 1:29:52 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: MountainLoop
I believe he's also weasel-wording those numbers; that's household income, meaning two wage earners. Divide by two for single wage-earner threshold.
11
posted on
10/28/2008 1:30:07 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
To: GunsareOK
That's the way Clinton did it in '93. In his campaign, he started out talking about a tax cut. Then after the election it switched to a tax increase, but only on "the rich". By the time Clinton and the 'Rat Congress got through, anyone making over about $22,000 ended up paying more in taxes. I guess that was the 'Rat definition of "the rich", 22 bills a year.
Elect 'Rats, and you get a tax increase. It's what they do. They will never change. I don't understand why the stupid sheeple can't get that through their stupid heads.
12
posted on
10/28/2008 1:30:12 PM PDT
by
chimera
To: Snappy1MarineMom
Sad thing is a lot of people have already voted. NOW the news is getting out. I hate the media.
13
posted on
10/28/2008 1:31:14 PM PDT
by
ladyvet
(WOLVERINES!!!!!)
To: MountainLoop
If you take that $150,000 figure and spread that out over the four years of an awful Obama presidency, you will get taxed for making about $102/day. This is a little more than what the average person might make, but it shows how sneaky the numbers are.
To: MountainLoop
0bama has voted for tax increases no less than 94 times.
I rilly rilly rilly believe he's going to lower taxes when it's to raise money for his budget and his pet pogroms...
15
posted on
10/28/2008 1:31:30 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Socialism doesn't work because of people./People don't work because of socialism...)
To: MountainLoop
Funny how we have to commit to a candidate based on what he says, but he doesn’t have to commit to what he says.
16
posted on
10/28/2008 1:31:53 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
To: LegalEagle61
Obama is such a pathological liar, I want to say “Yeah, that’s the ticket” every time he opens his mouth.
17
posted on
10/28/2008 1:33:25 PM PDT
by
autumnraine
(Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
To: null and void
Yep, you have the “progroms” correct. That is how these socialists deal with Israel.
To: MountainLoop
Shades of Bill Clinton 1993.
To: MountainLoop
It doesn’t matter what they say during the campaign. Your taxes are going up under the Democrats unless you are on welfare.
20
posted on
10/28/2008 1:40:21 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson