Posted on 10/29/2008 6:34:55 AM PDT by Reaganesque
Clearly.
Agreed. You and Romney are cowards, who will hide under a rock until that moment to attack again.
Despite your claim, the facts say otherwise.
First, finding a sentence with the absence of evidence,
does not defeat the plethora of evidence showing Romney
behind every backstabbing innuendo and scheme in Election2008
from his phoney badges, to his pushpolls, to his using
other people from his Hive to attack a GOP candidate's children for his own.
Second, Steve Schmidt is another M4-Romney RomneyAttackBOT plunging a knife into
Gov. Palin and her children for the pooch- and GOP-screwing Mitt-Romney,
the venal shapeshifting backstabbing malignant admitted socialist and fascist.
Would you share with FReeRepublic a picture of that chair your Master sent his minion?
ROmney, and his servants, illegal aliens, and RomneyBOTs, played his "Meadow Mountain Massacre 2008" Card.
There have been so many connections between the incessant attacks on Gov. Palin and Team Romney,
that it is clear that there is only one GOP, reprehensible, malevolent, candidate who decided to rape America
after it correctly refused to choose Romney, no matter how much he spent trying to buy Election 2008.
"With the gossipy attacks on Sarah Palin spreading, people have asked:cui bono? Who benefits from tearing down Palin at the end of this campaign? Some have speculated that Mitt Romney benefits in 2012 from having Palin sidelined, and that aides from his campaign that worked for John McCain might be behind the attacks. Not so, says Katie Connolly of Newsweek, where most of those attacks got reported:
Mike Galanos, CNN: Katie, a report I read, help me out here on this one, Im not sure if you heard this, there was some Romney aides that now came into the McCain campaign and it was the Romney aides that began spreading the dirt about Sarah Palin and basically in a fight already to see who is going to lead the party in the future. Any truth to that?
Katie Connolly, Newsweek: Absolutely not. Not from what I know. I think thats completely false."
So, yet more evidence that Romney staffers are likely NOT the sources of the leaks. Of course, this evidence is no match for your vague, anonymous and unsupported speculation, is it? Anonymous sources always trump identified and reliable ones, eh? I have evidence and have presented it. Show me yours or are you only capable of overheated verbal abuse?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.