Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater
Actually, the folks at BAR (Biblical Archaeology Review) have continued to put together sources supporting the original claims.

There is alot of animosity to allowing anything to prove Jesus. And alot of fakes to be sure - but this one is still up in the air, from all that I have read.

12 posted on 10/29/2008 8:29:59 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: txzman
Actually, the folks at BAR (Biblical Archaeology Review) have continued to put together sources supporting the original claims.

That's one of the reasons I let my BAR subscription lapse a couple of years ago. I got tired of Hershel Shanks defending what I assumed to be a fake. I recently resubscribed but maybe I need to re-examine my original assumption. We'll probably never know for sure if this is authentic. Of course, even if it is 2,000 years old it doesn't mean it refers to THE Jesus, THE James and THE Joseph.

26 posted on 10/30/2008 5:46:41 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson