They’re not legally obligated to host it. They have the right to refuse any customer they wish.
And they would not be refusing on the basis of race, but on the basis of extremism.
Of course, they would be sued.
And so they are probably intimidated.
But this is one case in which I think they should have stood firm and refused.
Why should they have refused it? This isn’t the Klan. they should no more refuse to host this event than they should the NAACP Convention. I find the NAACP to be far more overtly racist and openly hostile to other races than any other so called legitimate organization in the country.