Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Is Setting Up Sarah
Boycott The New York Times ^ | October 31, 2008 | Don Feder

Posted on 10/31/2008 11:07:22 AM PDT by AIM Freeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: AIM Freeper

They are not “setting her up.” They don’t have the ability to “set her up.” They would have to build her up falsely, then knock her down somehow to “set her up.” Obviously, they have not built her up in any way, shape or form. They have attempted to tear her down since day one. We know all about it, and no longer fear the New York Times, because they have no power over us. This is true about all of the appendages of the Major Media propaganda arm of the Democrat Party. They are all working for the invitation to the cocktail parties.


21 posted on 10/31/2008 12:28:41 PM PDT by webheart (All sarcasm contained in this post is intentional, and does not necessarily reflect a real opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

Did you read that Dribble from Peggy Noonan?

She is sooo gone... in the head.


22 posted on 10/31/2008 12:39:57 PM PDT by Saint Athanasius ("I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Maybe this is the newest strategery! Talk about the NYT rather than talking about Zero kaka 0baminus, a modern day math that proves Zero = negative!

There others around that are doing the same thing; “concentrating on other subjects” to limit lurkers from learning about him.

Either way, they’ll all be gone by Nov. 5.


23 posted on 10/31/2008 1:08:28 PM PDT by melancholy (0bama: The One Communist who may become POTUS proving that 50% of us = 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
We have another job in mind for her after she's done being VP

Regardless of the outcome of this election, that's what the libs fear most, a Thatcher emerging!

24 posted on 10/31/2008 1:12:43 PM PDT by melancholy (0bama: The One Communist who may become POTUS proving that 50% of us = 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
I honestly don't think can figure out what their current strategy is.

If they come on too strong, they get zotted. If they're too subtle, they end-up sounding like real FReepers, then they don't get paid!

Tough job.

25 posted on 10/31/2008 1:24:09 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Saint Athanasius
Did you read that Dribble from Peggy Noonan?

No, does she play for the Harlem Globetrotters?

/sarc

I did read her article full of drivel though. You realize that the msm will, from the this point forward, eagerly trot her out as the token voice of "conservatism".

26 posted on 10/31/2008 1:37:09 PM PDT by rhinohunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

Pretty soon the Slimes won’t be able to borrow enough money to buy ink or paper...


27 posted on 10/31/2008 1:46:05 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
The.Media.Does.Not.Know.Blue.Jeans.America.

That's why we confound them every time. Just when they think they've got us pegged....

28 posted on 10/31/2008 2:58:52 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch, pray, and work. This election will separate the sheep from the goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper
And if McCain wins, will they blame 0Bama's loss on Biden?

I don't think anyone would believe that.

29 posted on 10/31/2008 3:07:33 PM PDT by eggman (Obama's Spread the Wealth will work just as well as Spread the Liabilities (sub-prime mortgages))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I think that’s why everyone keeps repeating the “no one votes for pres on the vp...” line so much this year! Because there are droves of us who want Sarah, and we’ll take McCain as boot.


30 posted on 10/31/2008 3:12:05 PM PDT by delphirogatio (Obama: Narcissistic Personality Disorder on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper
That aside, nobody votes for a presidential candidate based on his running mate, regardless of what they tell pollsters.

Actually, that's not true this year.

I believe that thousands and thousands who would not have bothered to vote for McCain are going to crawl across broken molten radioactive glass to pull the lever for Sarah.

I know I am...

31 posted on 10/31/2008 6:42:41 PM PDT by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart
This is true about all of the appendages of the Major Media propaganda arm of the Democrat Party. They are all working for the invitation to the cocktail parties.

The mistake is when the reporter thinks they're valued for who they are - not what they offer. Reporters are valued for what they can do for a politician. Period. Those "party" offers evaporate the minute the "power" behind their job goes away.

32 posted on 11/01/2008 12:57:31 PM PDT by GOPJ (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson