Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
It will invalidate them. The amendment is quite clear on what is defined to be a marriage. And the state courts have to follow the state constitution.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 10/31/2008 6:52:55 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

When slavery was outlawed by the US Constitution does that mean existing slaves must remain with their masters??? Using the pro gay marriage logic, the answer would be YES.


6 posted on 10/31/2008 7:12:25 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop

The AG disagrees with your assessment on ex post facto grounds. The status of those marriages will definitely be battled in the courts.


22 posted on 11/01/2008 7:43:23 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: YES on PROP 4. *** MCCAIN-PALIN ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson