Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ravi

We need to be concerned about the fact that the polls of early voters indicate a significant lead often for Obama.

They are only somewhat reliable, but still something to look at.

I am concerned O is not going to PA, as that makes it seem they are not concerned about that state. We may need PA.

At the same time, there are many encouraging signs for us as well, which just makes me so glad tomorrow is the end of this madhouse, even if we lose.


6 posted on 11/03/2008 10:44:36 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas

I remain cautiously optimistic. Even this early voting lead poll is not accurate. Fox just showed that of those that have already voted, Obama is ahead only by one point. Someone is really f***ing up these numbers. Last week it was Obama by 9. No one really knows what’s going on out there and it’s up to us to vote and bring everyone we know to vote also and things will turn out well.


8 posted on 11/03/2008 10:48:49 AM PST by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

I’ve been playing around on the those interactive electoral maps thos morning, and I don’t see any way McCain pulls this out without PA. I hope I’m wrong, but it doesn’t look good to me if McCain loses PA.


9 posted on 11/03/2008 10:49:52 AM PST by sola_fide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

I am concerned that Acorn’s fake registers are voting absentee.


20 posted on 11/03/2008 11:07:47 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

“We need to be concerned about the fact that the polls of early voters indicate a significant lead often for Obama.”

It’s a concern, but those polls are highly skewed.
Rush reported on the internals on one poll, they are so far off they are practically garbage.

OTOH, the early voting does indicate to some extent a better GOTV operation by the Democrats.
I can give you the numbers here for Travis Co Texas-
the Dems had about 60% turnout for EV, the Repubs about 55% for EV, these are base voters only and in Travis a lot more Dem than GOP based voters, and the G voters were around 35%. This was weds numbers, about 2 days before final voting. By Friday, the GOP was surely over 60% and the Dems near 70%.

Basically this means that the Dems have already turned out and voted most of their base. Election day in parts of Texas will be about indies mostly. To some extent this doesnt mean much, if these were ‘certain’ voters anyway, OTOH, the more they turnout early, the easier to

GOTV DOES MATTER. I was able to get 100% GOP turnout in my precinct in 2004. I am seeing a bit higher level of motivation than in 2004 and certainly more GOP energy (mainly FEAR) than 2006. Use that energy to do GOTV.

If we get close to 100% of the base voting for our guy *AND* win enough the indies, we win the election. That’s how the game is played.


26 posted on 11/03/2008 11:28:07 AM PST by WOSG (STOP OBAMA'S SOCIALISM - Change we need: Replace the Democrat Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Could the early voting numbers simply mean that they voted early! Nothing more perhaps! So they voted early, big deal??


38 posted on 11/03/2008 12:14:50 PM PST by Friendofgeorge (TINA FEY WISHES SHE LOOKED LIKE SARAH PALIN. FEY IS HOMELY, SARAH IS KNOCKOUT DROP DEAD GORGEOUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson