Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/03/2008 2:15:08 PM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: COUNTrecount

I certainly hope so.


2 posted on 11/03/2008 2:17:22 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Why not? A win is a win for us, period.


3 posted on 11/03/2008 2:17:42 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

What’s remarkable to me is that there was a bigger spread between Kerry and Bush in 2004 ..... and Kerry lost big time.


4 posted on 11/03/2008 2:17:42 PM PST by SkyDancer ("I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

No bias here.


5 posted on 11/03/2008 2:17:50 PM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Obama will lose the popular vote and the electoral college, and there will be riots in LA, Chicago, Harlem, Detroit, etc...


6 posted on 11/03/2008 2:18:30 PM PST by petercooper (I am a bitter clinger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Recipie for weeklong riots.


7 posted on 11/03/2008 2:18:33 PM PST by Crazieman (If CON is the opposite of PRO, what is the opposite of PROGRESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I really don’t think this election is going to be that close.


8 posted on 11/03/2008 2:18:48 PM PST by Egon (The difference between Theory and Practice: In Theory, there is no difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

No problem. Lock and Load. Mayors who won’t issue ball ammunition to the National Guard suffer the consequences.


9 posted on 11/03/2008 2:18:55 PM PST by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Sure, the electoral college is what prevents NY, TX and CA from electing every President.


10 posted on 11/03/2008 2:22:24 PM PST by Tarpon (Barack Obama will ban all the guns he has the votes for ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I don’t see that developing... but to answer the question: Yes. He will likely win the big cities where the welfare is concentrated, as do all Dems. Those by themselves won’t give him enough electoral votes.


11 posted on 11/03/2008 2:22:29 PM PST by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I hope the fire departments in LA, NYC, Chicago and DC have their trucks primed and ready.

Tuesday night is gonna be a long one.


12 posted on 11/03/2008 2:25:27 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Reagan-1976 Palin-2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I would almost prefer that Obama win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote. It would be another reminder that the Constitution still works “whether they like it or not” (to quote Gavin Newsom).


13 posted on 11/03/2008 2:25:41 PM PST by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Getting nervous AP/Yahoo?


17 posted on 11/03/2008 2:29:25 PM PST by CycloneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Of course Obama losing means a complete overhaul of the electoral system is necessary. If Obama wins, it’s fine!


19 posted on 11/03/2008 2:36:24 PM PST by soloNYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
It could be tie (269-269).

Or it could come down to one electoral vote in Northeastern Maine.

You'll have a better idea when results come in from Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, and New Hampshire.

But really, wouldn't Nevada been more likely to go for Obama than Colorado?

21 posted on 11/03/2008 2:37:40 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I wouldn’t put it past the Democrat Congress, if that scenerio occured, to try and overturn the electoral vote by refusing to certify the electoral vote or a particular state’s electoral vote “in the interest of democracy” or something like that.


22 posted on 11/03/2008 2:38:51 PM PST by daniel885
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
Can Obama win popular vote but lose election?

You can count on it Lizzie; you can count on it.

25 posted on 11/03/2008 2:40:17 PM PST by no dems (My Electoral Vote Prediction: McCain 275 / Obama 263)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Yes, and if McCain pulls out the inside straight that is probably what will happen.


30 posted on 11/03/2008 2:42:52 PM PST by jwalsh07 (It's the Marxism Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
A thought ~ I've watched dozens, maybe even hundreds of political campaign gatherings the last few months. A regular feature of Republican events is a vast horde of children. Republicans bring their kids out to see the candidates.

Sometimes you see a Democrat doing that ~ maybe a baby in a buggy. But it's rare to see children at Obama events.

Could it be a difference in the perception of relative safety?

Do Republicans confidently take their kids with them because they know nobody will get a purse stolen at the event? Could Democrats be pulling a Jesse Jackson "if you see young men down the sidewalk" deal and keeping the kids at home because they feel unsafe?

The difference is so obvious you just gotta' ask who the heck is attending these Obama events that has all the Democrats frightened?

33 posted on 11/03/2008 2:46:47 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

Democrats put way too much faith in polls especailly sicne they are weighted in their favor and who knows how many are purposely lying to pollsters. Our elections ahve always been based on electoral votes and no one even heard ofthe “popular vote” until Gore’s campaign came up with it and it is meaningless without a constitutional amendment to change it.


36 posted on 11/03/2008 2:48:34 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson