Posted on 11/10/2008 4:13:31 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
http://www.astroengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/livingston-penn_sunspots2.pdf
I remain concerned that the "sunspot numbers" reported at spaceweather.com (NASA's solar weather site) are a bit inflated compared to historical numbers.
quick hypothesis with regard to earth temps, please, if you’re into that ?
Obviously the sun is racist.
“quick hypothesis with regard to earth temps, please, if youre into that?”
I think we’re already into a cooling trend, and from what I understand that should continue for at least a few more years. That’s based on the solar cycle picking up from here.
If we remain in a minimum longer, temps will fall further and lower. A spike of a few sunspot groups doesn’t really mean much. If you look at historical sunspot number plots, the sunspot numbers will head above 50 consistently pretty quickly once the new cycle starts. So, that’s what I’m watching for. The paper I linked from the NSO points to a possible mechanism for the “minimum” events like the Dalton and Maunder minimums, and if one of those is happening then temps will fall to a point where there’ll be a strong negative impact - and making the global warming crowd look pretty silly in the process.
NASA has their fingers crossed and crossed again that this is the minimum, because global temperatures are going to make them look pretty silly if they keep falling.
Of course, they have not figured out yet that cheerleading has little effect on sunspot activity.
I love science in general, cosmology and astronomy in particular, but doesn’t it seem kind of strange to be talking about 11-year cycles in a star that is 4.5 billion years old?
*sigh* Anyway, I just turned 57.
“I love science in general, cosmology and astronomy in particular, but doesnt it seem kind of strange to be talking about 11-year cycles in a star that is 4.5 billion years old?”
Probably not any more strange than talking about pulse rate on a person. :-)
It would be shortsighted to think that eleven year timescales are the ONLY important ones, though. The fact that the Sun has been relatively stable for quite a while is easy to take for granted...
Thank God.
We just about froze all summer.
“Right now is just a space between ice ages”
[Van Halen]
So far they've been really, really, really wrong.
Gonna' be a cold winter Fur Shur. Lake Michigan will freeze over like it hasn't done for 30 years, and large sheets will cover Lake Shore Drive and cause regular problems on the parallel Interstate a few blocks to the West.
Obama will declare a National Emergency to "save Chicago from the Lake".
bttt
I didn't think it was possible for the AGW folks to look more silly than they already do.....
I spent a winter working in the Benton Harbor area about 10 years ago. It wasn't all that cold, but man do ya'll get the snow! One storm dropped over 3' in about 4-5 hours. We went from a bare parking lot at the hotel where I was staying to about waist deep snow in about 4 hours.....
Then get you enough popcorn popping to last at least 4 years.
I've seen the ice pushed up over parts of Lake Shore Drive, and old newspaper files show pictures of ice pushing up against buildings in downtown Chicago.
It's coming.
Wow! Obama was elected less than a week ago, and he’s already solved global warming!
I didn't get to see that, but I built a cell site in Bridgeman, MI, right behind the McDonald's off of I-94. We had easement access to the site from the McDonald's parking lot. After that big dump, McDonald's plowed their parking lot and left a 20' tall pile of snow blocking our access the day the tower was delivered. The trucking company charged them $500/hr the whole time it was sitting there waiting for them to move the snow. I don't think I've ever seen anybody as mad as the manager of that Micky D's that day....
Hathaway (the NASA solar expert in the middle of these comments) has been “pushing” his theories that Solar Cycle 24 would be very high, peak very early, and last a very long time. He predicted solar cycle 24 would be clearly starting as early as summer 2006 - that would mean a sunspot count of 35-50 average.
However, these handful of spots in October, preceded by ONE spot in September, and ONE spot way back in January just MIGHT mean that “his cycle” is finally beginning to slope up. Maybe. If cycle 24 is actually going up - we might not be facing the problems of several cold decades like in the Dalton Minimum.
Then again - unlike Gore, I don’t we can control the sun with a democrat majority.
“A new high-latitude sunspot is emerging in the sun’s northern hemisphere. “ SpaceWeather.com
It’s warmer already! +6 this morning!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.