Thank you, I think.
I have read the whole thread and have the basic jist, but if the rules are no summaries allowed, then so be it. Some of us at work don’t always have hours to sift through all the info.
Thanks anyway for the tip....
Guy claiming to be source of Palin smear is exposed as professional hoaxer...
question remains, was he the source for Fox’s report of Palin smear?
It’s not that there are no summaries allowed- threads/stories are allowed to take their own course. This is developing. If and when it is determined what actually happened there will be threads that tell what was found. If you don’t have time to keep up, then just keep following the story as best you can- it will at some point likely be sorted out.
A summary at this point wouldn’t do alot of good- there are still many clues and angles to follow- some will be red herrings but some will pay off. A new thread would get as confusing as this one while this is still in progress.
There are some fine detectives on this site and it is amazing to see these stories get sorted out, and they usually do.
We can have a good summary when Foxnews explains how Carl Cameron acquired the story!