Posted on 11/10/2008 9:39:40 PM PST by WaveMan
Arizonas Supreme Court chief justice has agreed to enforce the Hispanic Bar Associations demands of banning the terms illegal and aliens in all of the states courtrooms.
Claiming that the terms are inflammatory, the president of Arizonas Hispanic Bar Association, (known as Los Abogados) has asked state Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor to stop using them at trials or hearings because they create perceptions of judicial bias.
In a strongly worded letter to the chief justice, Los Abogados president says attaching an illegal status to a person establishes a brand of contemptibility, creates the appearance of anti-immigrant prejudice and tarnishes the image of courts as a place where disputes may be fairly resolved.
It further points out that no human being is illegal and that a national Hispanic journalism association has roundly criticized the reference for dehumanizing a segment of the population. The letter goes on to criticize the states High Court for using the term illegals in at least two opinions and the term illegal aliens in dozens of others.
It concludes with a list of acceptable and unacceptable terms relating to illegal immigration. Among those the group wants banned are; immigration crisis, immigration epidemic, open borders advocates, anchor babies and invaders. Among the acceptable terms are foreign nationals, unauthorized workers and human rights advocates. Click here to see the entire list as well as Chief Justice McGregors promise to enforce the requests.
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
> The term, illegal alien, is used extensively in Federal statutes.
That’s good info to know SD.
Wasn’t aware you could force language changes on the people.
What an ass this judge is.
Illegal aliens should ALL be rounded up and sent back to from whatever crap hole they came from.
And Arizona has the McLame politicians and judges they deserve.
1. Reading the original exchange of letters linked to in the blog, note how the Chief Justice addresses the Abogados by their first names. A bit chummy, no?
2. Not surprisingly, the Abogados use that old canard how no person is “illegal”. Hello! “Illegal alien” is a compound term. “Illegal” just qualifies the subject. If I said I am a “football fan”, would anyone in their right mind reply “no person is a football”? Strangely, I’ve never seen this idiocy pointed out.
As someone on another thread stated,
if we called thieves “butterflies”,
then it wouldn’t be long before “butterflies” was a derogatory term.
Maybe we should call them “border enforcement failures”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.