Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Broadcast Blackout of Left’s 'Fairness' Doctrine Push
NewsBusters ^ | November 12, 2008 - 10:32 ET | Rich Noyes

Posted on 11/12/2008 9:05:45 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

We need to stop referring to this proposal at “The Fairness Doctrine” and characterize it as The 21st Century Equivalent to Bookburning”.


21 posted on 11/12/2008 9:28:22 AM PST by caper gal 1 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

....Or civil warII in America.


22 posted on 11/12/2008 9:29:36 AM PST by Biggirl (Leave Sarah ALONE!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Loss of free speech, Loss of the ability to trust in voting not being corrupted by deliberate design of one party,
Loss of the means of personal and national defense,
Loss of half your income,
Confiscation of your 401k,
US financial laws being negotiated this week to prepare the USA fiscal system to be submitted to the UN?
Proposals to force my daughter to perform service in “poor areas” of our country and around the world?
Religion systematically crushed.
What combination of these, or which gross violation of one, will be the spark?

There truly is a line.
Publish the Declaration of Independence today, listing instead the current transgressions against freedom rather than those of King George, and you will probably be on some watch list.

Think about that.


23 posted on 11/12/2008 9:32:18 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
While talk radio hosts often warned during the campaign that free speech could be trampled by an all-Democratic majority, the broadcast networks have failed to react to this dangerous threat to the First Amendment.

TV networks don't care because this only applies to radio.

24 posted on 11/12/2008 9:32:47 AM PST by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

The government didn’t like what Howard Stern was saying but he says it every morning on Sirius. If people are willing to pay why can’t they hear whatever they want?


25 posted on 11/12/2008 9:33:27 AM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
"I predict also a severe uptick in lawsuits against sites like FR."

I don't think they can do that unless they also go after sites like Huff and Koz. That is a fight that both the left and right could win. FR has the added bonus over both Koz and Huff of not accepting advertising revenue.
26 posted on 11/12/2008 9:35:11 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

When we said “free speech”, we didn’t mean for people who disagree. :D


27 posted on 11/12/2008 9:36:51 AM PST by Tzimisce (http://groups.myspace.com/nailthemessiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster

Government decided the airwaves were public by fiat, what stops them from doing the same from the frequencies satellites use? Stroke of a pen,,, executive order,,, satellite under the FCC.

Radio is becoming irrelevant, Satellite, internet, and cable are exploding. They will find a way in very soon. They must be able to control the discourse.


28 posted on 11/12/2008 9:38:03 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
"I don't think they can do that unless they also go after sites like Huff and Koz. That is a fight that both the left and right could win. FR has the added bonus over both Koz and Huff of not accepting advertising revenue..."

It won't be the government who sues.

it will be NYTIMESWAPOCHICAGOTRIBUNEABCNBCCBSMSNBCCNN

29 posted on 11/12/2008 9:39:18 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kempster

“Could this also be enforced on XM Radio and Sirius?”

I don’t believe so, because it’s not on the general airwaves. You have to subscribe. I would envision Rush, Hannity, Ingraham, Bruce et al to end up there if the FD does go into force.


30 posted on 11/12/2008 9:39:27 AM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Making a stand on 4 Nov 08 for America: 63% for McCain/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Any one of these could be the spark that causes the USA to ‘exploit” in violet in-fighting that will end the USA.


31 posted on 11/12/2008 9:40:35 AM PST by Biggirl (Leave Sarah ALONE!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

How will we find each other to email? It is very scary to me that all means of communication will be cut off to anyone who doesn’t do the liberal jig.


32 posted on 11/12/2008 9:41:23 AM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Plus internet conservitve websites can simply do off-shoring bigtime.


33 posted on 11/12/2008 9:41:45 AM PST by Biggirl (Leave Sarah ALONE!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kempster

As it was previously written, no. But I’ve heard some talk of them using the Interstate Commerce Clause to justify giving themselves jurisdiction over everything (cable, satellite, internet).

But as another poster said, it’s a moot point. Once they get into the business of censoring political speech, we can kiss the First Amendment — and our asses — goodbye. We’ll be crushed. America will cease to be.


34 posted on 11/12/2008 9:42:01 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Flood's coming. Texas is the Ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
I cannot disagree with you one little bit. I am still hopeful that Democrats are just talking loudly and carrying a twig, but I'm not counting on it.

My greatest concern is that the Democrats, flush with power, still seething over George Bush's Presidency and misreading the results of a close election as a "mandate" will overreach on a grand scale.

But, unlike the Clinton Administration, these people are true radicals who desire nothing less than the complete transformation of American government and society into the utopian socialist model of their dreams - and our nightmares.

Perhaps they believe that conservatives will stand idly by and let it happen. Some in fact, may. I will not.

35 posted on 11/12/2008 9:42:33 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Liberty has few friends, many enemies, and no adequate substitute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

Some old radicals i read about in 6th grade wrote this,,
I think they were from Philadelphia??

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”


36 posted on 11/12/2008 9:44:10 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives
Even the Democrats know that a silenced majority will become an angry majority. When people feel they are not being heard or represented, they vote out the controlling party. (Which is what happened in 2006/2008.)

It would be foolish to silence conservatism if the Dems want to stay in power.

Pursuing this avenue will also cause division within. It is the perfect opportunity for a nobody Democrat Congressman, with strong leadership ability, to rise to fame championing “Free Speech”.

37 posted on 11/12/2008 9:45:18 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Sirius is on the verge of bankruptcy.


38 posted on 11/12/2008 9:46:28 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: umgud
TV networks don't care because this only applies to radio.

In practice that might be true, but in actuallity it applies to both radio and broadcast TV. Why it doesn't appear to apply to TV anymore is that the broadcast networks no longer have what was known as editorial viewpoints, as they once did. Instead they just cover their editorial position under the cloak of "news."

39 posted on 11/12/2008 9:47:21 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

OK. I misunderstood the context. Thanks.


40 posted on 11/12/2008 9:49:49 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson