"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Seems quite clear to me. I wonder what it is about "no law" and "abridging the freedom of speech" that the Dems don't seem to understand. I guess I need more "nuance training" so that I can see what they see in the First Amendment that would allow anything so obviously in violation of the Constitution as the (Un)Fairness Doctrine.
I say the major radio networks need to refuse to comply if the “Fairness Doctrine” is reinstated. It needs to go to the Supreme Court while we still have a small majority.
Should be one hellava spectacle!
Seems to me that McCain/Fiengold has already taken care of this pesky clause.