To: SJackson
In brief, Jacob, you're a moron.
McCain lost because of McCain. If it weren't for Sarah, it would have been a landslide for Obama.
8 posted on
11/13/2008 6:06:02 AM PST by
rintense
(I don't wanna gain the whole world and lose my soul~ TobyMac (are you listening Obamabots?))
To: rintense
Please read the entire article. It really defends Sarah from the McCain camp.
What is with McCain anyway? He never did denounce the false allegations from his advisors.
Sarah will run and WIN in 2012 by running a winning campaign. Something Senator McCain failed to do in 08.
Sarah is the ONE!!
Votes FOR Women!!
To: rintense
Please read the entire article. It really defends Sarah from the McCain camp.
What is with McCain anyway? He never did denounce the false allegations from his advisors.
Sarah will run and WIN in 2012 by running a winning campaign. Something Senator McCain failed to do in 08.
Sarah is the ONE!!
Votes FOR Women!!
To: rintense
McCain lost because of McCain. If it weren't for Sarah, it would have been a landslide for Obama.
It was a landslide for Obama - he got around 70% of the electoral votes, almost 8 million more votes total, and he picked up states that had been Republican. It's hard to get much more humiliating than that, without going back to Reagan.
She was on a ticket that lost by over 200 electoral votes to a guy with "Hussein" in his name, and that has associated with lots of sleazy people. She will probably end up replacing Stevens, but don't look for her in 2012. The GOP leadership made it clear what they thought of her by making her go through all of her clothes. I was not a fan of her's, but I'm as disgusted as her dad was when he spoke about the clothing crap, but I guess the GOP wanted to let her know who runs things in the party.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson