I’m with you. It’s politically motivated to shut him up.
They claim he received privileged information and promised he wouldn’t disclose it. He sold his shares instead.
So you leak information to a shareholder, he sells, and it’s somehow his fault?
Actually, it is - if the information is private and not generally known.
However, the fact that this allegation is from 2004 makes it highly suspicious.
What are you talking about? What do you think INSIDER TRADING is? There’s a reason for insider trading laws...this is it..if there were no laws, only a few would benefit. Do you know anything about how markets work?