Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

The implication is that researchers steer away from topics that would offend the conservatives who have been dealing out the grants. But there is also the unmentionned possibility that researchers steer away from topics or conclusions that might offend their liberal colleagues - particularly if they don’t have tenure. But even tenure doesn’t stop censorship.

Even a famous and tenured Harvard professor, David Putnam, censored himself for a number of years regarding his findings that increased diversity decreased community trust. And Larry Summers as Harvard president sure showed researchers where they dare not go.


8 posted on 11/19/2008 9:28:45 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: heartwood

In other words, the grant system reinforces the orthodoxy of the day and if the researcher want to keep his snout in the trough he”ll say the right things to the right people.


12 posted on 11/19/2008 10:27:14 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson