[Tax Government]

Is it not supposed to work like this? 1) Someone brings a suit and it is decided on fact. 2) The appellate court may then judge the application of law, but not determine fact. 3) Then, the supreme court may review and again judge the application of law, perhaps addressing conflicts between laws. Where is this now? I think step 1 hasn’t occurred.

[goldstategop]

An appellate court does NOT try questions of fact. But raised here are questions of law and they need to be resolved.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus