The incrementalists give up the core principles. After that, there’s nothing left but a phony shell.
You are going to have to do a lot better than that.
It’s true that some “incrementalists give up the core principles”.
It’s also true that some “incrementalists” would be happy with stopping at leaving abortion legal for rape incest health of mother etc. Well they’re not completly pro-life.
The core of the Movement believes that it is always wrong to kill an innocent person—murder.
Of the core a majority want to save as many as possible now while also working towards the future HLA.
EV, please explain what is wrong with that.
It is estimated that FOCA will cause an additional 125,000 babies per year to be aborted*.
EV that means that the “incrementalist” approach has been saving 125,000 babies every year for many years.
This has in no way stopped efforts to advance the cause to stop all abortions. If anything it has helped educate 125,000 more mothers to become pro-life. How many of them will communicate the pro-life message versus how many would have been stuck in the pro-abortion message.
EV, Please explain how any of this is bad or causes me to “give up the core principles. After that, there’s nothing left but a phony shell.”
That really does not make sense to true pro-lifers.
Barack Obama’s “Freedom of Choice Act” Would Mean 125K More Abortions
http://www.lifenews.com/nat4359.html