Jill Stanek is part of the problem. Big time.
OK EV, Ill play
First from the article:
“This debate isnt even comparable to Sophies Choice, being forced to choose which children live or die. All children slated for abortion are going to die. But if given the opportunity, do we not rescue any of them? Purists say no, not unless we can rescue all of them.
EV, It is not possible to pass a HLA. http://www.nchla.org/
Not even remotely possible at this time. We should save as many babies as we possibly can, NOW while also working to change the culture so that in the future a HLA will be possible.
This should never have been presented as an either or scenario. IMO, it is a both and real world situation. You do everything you can whenever you can.
When it becomes possible to pass a HLA, by all means we will do it.
The so-called purist seems to think that if we work incrementally now (which has saved untold thousands) that somehow will prevent us from working on a HLA when it is possible. That is very short sighted and costs lives in the process.
Expand. Document. Link.