Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS and the Presidential election
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=121789;title=APFN ^

Posted on 11/21/2008 11:35:11 AM PST by Writesider

Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570 contains the details.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; philipberg; scotus; souter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Writesider

Hmmm... Not really digging the source... any others out there?


21 posted on 11/21/2008 11:57:25 AM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Writesider

Nothing on the docket yet, but it’s not necessarily updated immediately. If the denial is reversed, and this docket is reviewed ALONG WITH 07-608, this will be sensational news!


No. 08-570
Title: Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.

Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.


22 posted on 11/21/2008 11:59:41 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Fred Nerks; LucyT; flattorney
I think SOUTER has the liberal agenda in mind, and will have a parallel track case to the Thomas NJ case.

The maneuvering has begun.

23 posted on 11/21/2008 12:00:13 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Oops, 07-608 is a completely different (but very interesting) case.
Don’t recall what the docket number was for the case that Souter rejected but Thomas accepted. Anyway, getting TWO of them actively before SCOTUS would be sensational.


24 posted on 11/21/2008 12:02:22 PM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the ping. Wowzers.


25 posted on 11/21/2008 12:21:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

These are the wto numbers I have in my notes, but OTTOMH can’t remember which is which.

08A407 and 08-4340


26 posted on 11/21/2008 12:31:50 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Could it be they will discuss both on the 5th????

Leo + Berg = 9-0 vote


27 posted on 11/21/2008 12:33:32 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

bookmark


28 posted on 11/21/2008 12:34:01 PM PST by mrs tiggywinkle (Hosea 10:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Writesider

Please let the Supreme Court act AFTER Janet Napolitano has resigned as Governor of Arizona! :)


29 posted on 11/21/2008 12:42:45 PM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Thanks. 08A407 is what I was looking for.
30 posted on 11/21/2008 12:44:19 PM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Fred Nerks; Beckwith; LucyT; flattorney
Could it be they will discuss both on the 5th???? Leo + Berg = 9-0 vote>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Maybe, but I have a feeling that Thomas will have his conference, and SOuter will have his seperately. If the Leo case goes against Obama, Souter might then bring Berg on for a Cert. Pet. hearing to distinguish or over-rule the Leo case.

Alito needs to rein this in maybe, and this could be showing us that the court is divided even before any hearing.

Hard to tell.

It would seem fine to hear them both at once, but each of them have different legal foundations.

31 posted on 11/21/2008 12:47:15 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

I don’t like it. The Donofrio case is much stronger and if you look at the filing it names three people, one of whom was born in Nicaragua, I think. I would love for them to look at all the cases, but IMO, if they choose just the Berg case it will not be the more compelling brief and that will be the end of it.


32 posted on 11/21/2008 12:58:59 PM PST by this is my country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Yes they are separate cases, however, they cut to the root of the same problem:

The constitution specifically stated the requirements for the office of the president. The SCOTUS have sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately the founding fathers did not establish who would/should vet each candidate to determine eligibility. Leo says SOS, Berg says DNC and FEC, .......

Personally I think the SCOTUS must rule this time on eligibility AND in their ruling establish an order for all candidate to follow in the future.

They may rule....It’s above DNC or SOS pay grade, but it sure in the _____won’t be above the SCOTUS’s pay.

That’s what they were created to do....CHeck and Balance....


33 posted on 11/21/2008 1:05:49 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Writesider

Oh my! If anything ever comes of this can you imagine! Obama has already resigned his Senate seat so he’d just be out on his ear unless the Gov of IL appointed him back to his seat.


34 posted on 11/21/2008 1:08:05 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba
Oh my! If anything ever comes of this can you imagine! Obama has already resigned his Senate seat so he’d just be out on his ear unless the Gov of IL appointed him back to his seat.

If "anything" ever comes of this, the loss of his Senate seat will be the least of his problems. Perhaps improving the view from his window at the Graybar Hotel will be more important to him.

35 posted on 11/21/2008 1:11:27 PM PST by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba
IMO Obama will be wearing orange for a while....Fraud, failure to register for the draft, lying on his application to practice law in Illinois.....He'll be lucky if treason charges are not filed for knowingly creating a “constitutional crisis”.
36 posted on 11/21/2008 1:17:09 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

The only reason to take it is to affirm his citizenship.


37 posted on 11/21/2008 1:28:13 PM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

The best thing that could happen would be if he went totally mad and was driven on a post-marxist rampage to repay all of his enlightened handlers.


38 posted on 11/21/2008 1:45:32 PM PST by Gemsbok (Follow the trail,...,.,.,.,..... I know where it leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: atlbelle44
Berg is pretty much gone.

No it's not.

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

39 posted on 11/21/2008 1:55:04 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I hope you are right. But somehow this whole thing could get very convoluted. We also have new anecdoatal evidence of Obama’s birth in Kenya.

*************

This AUDIO is just in — the Kenyan Ambassador to the United States says that “it is already well known” that Obama was born in Kenya (start listening at 12:00 minutes into audio) );

The Obama File — Latest News

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2135329/posts?page=248#248


40 posted on 11/21/2008 3:11:02 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson