To: calcowgirl
I’ve said before.. this was a case of a guilty man being framed by a “win at all costs” prosecution.
9 posted on
11/21/2008 1:08:03 PM PST by
Chet 99
To: Chet 99
I’ve said before.. this was a case of a guilty man being framed by a “win at all costs” prosecution.
_______
Chuckling. So in this case, we have the first recorded evidence that 2 wrongs can make a right?
10 posted on
11/21/2008 1:12:58 PM PST by
dmz
To: Chet 99; Carley
I’ve said before.. this was a case of a guilty man being framed by a “win at all costs” prosecution. I agree with the win at all costs prosecution. And I think he was guilty of trusting the wrong people. I haven't seen enough to make me believe he was truly guilty of what he was convicted of, though (given the questionable nature of the prosecution and evidence).
16 posted on
11/21/2008 1:35:34 PM PST by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: Chet 99
I’ve said before.. this was a case of a guilty man being framed by a “win at all costs” prosecution.Bump, that!!
19 posted on
11/21/2008 2:36:44 PM PST by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson