Because of security issues, I don’t have a problem with this. First, kids shouldn’t be a part of a political disagreement. Second, the kids of a POTUS really are subject to special dangers.
But think of all the attention, extra money and better teachers if the Obamas had insisted the girls attend a public school.
They could have had their daddy improve the educations and lives of so many poor children in D.C. You know — CHANGE and share the wealth?
Obama is nothing but a liar.
“Because of security issues, I don’t have a problem with this. First, kids shouldn’t be a part of a political disagreement. Second, the kids of a POTUS really are subject to special dangers.”
They deserve to be protected, no Secret Sevice problem there, but you are assuming that more dangers exist in govt. ed. versus private ed. That’s classist. Methinks you take issue with the great unwashed. I am sure there are some perfectly good public ed institutions in DC without errant gun-play.
“First, kids shouldn’t be a part of a political disagreement.”
Go talk to Trig and Bristol about this little sentiment. It will cut both ways. Nothing is off base for the left these days so deal with it.
Nonetheless, Jenna Bush went to UoTexas without any national security issue arising. That is a public college the last time I checked. The difference is?!?
This private elite school costs 30k a year and the obvious hypocrisy is beyond laughable when the vast majority of black parents would jump at the chance to properly educate their children. The majority are left with no ‘choice’ in the matter.
Some animals are more equal than others...
tehDeets