“Because my enemy behaves unethically does not mean that I should.”
The Rules for Radicals have changed. Deal.
I have maintained a position buttressed with fact, logic, & reason without interjecting the kids.
Semantically, I want Barry to live up to his words, just his words. Am I not my brother’s keeper?
I’m glad you can so blithely ignore educational genocide. I choose these words carefully.
Education, or the lack thereof, has become this great nation’s soft-underbelly.
I can not and will not stand for blatant hypocrisy from our elected leaders on the matter.
“Besides, when we expose a Potus or family to danger, the ones who will pay the price will be our brave young men and women from a variety of super-elite forces.”
For you to imply that I am lobbying to expose anyone to danger is asinine. Those ‘super-elite forces’ of which you spoke, the best among us are daily exposed to those dangers and train continually to mitigate any threat. Those threats will never lessen, they only become greater, no matter the political party in power.
We know a great deal about these state secrecy issues because the NYSlimes, et al have informed the world about them. Hello Daily Threat Assessment IOW the Presidential Daily Briefing.
Daily danger is their duty. They take an oath, with sincere, patriotic gusto. I went to school with those brave individuals. They are better than I. They are my closest friends. I consider them family so I do not take their safety lightly. I abhor the assertion that I do.
Happy Thanksgiving & Merry Christmas to you and yours.
tehDeets
I used zero 2nd person pronouns. I exclusively used 1st person pronouns. Therefore, there were no assertions and no lobbying. I stated fact: to endanger Potus or family will endanger our best of the best.