Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
Wrong again GGG. They included case CG because a fraction of genes did fit that pattern, not the majority. This overlap is more frequent in genetic DNA than genomic DNA because there is less difference in genetic DNA between species than genomic DNA, and in terms of absolute difference humans chimps and gorillas are all fairly similar in DNA. Analysis using ERV data, for example, has much less to no “overlap” as the differences are more pronounced (as predicted by Kamura’s neutral mutation theory).

The authors you source clearly show that the majority of the genetic data they worked with was more similar between humans and chimps than between chimps and gorillas.

Do you think the authors were similarly “trapped by (their) reductionist understanding of the role of DNA”. Were the authors the victim of a “slovenly commitment to reductionist materialism”? The inescapable conclusion of their data is that humans and chimps diverged more recently than gorillas. Do you see fit to correct them on their own data, and based upon what exactly?

336 posted on 12/02/2008 11:05:41 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

==They included case CG because a fraction of genes did fit that pattern, not the majority.

Correction: a CONSIDERABLE fraction that cannot be explained by the current Darwiniac human-chimp catechism.

==This overlap is more frequent in genetic DNA than genomic DNA because there is less difference in genetic DNA between species than genomic DNA

I bet you haven’t the slightest clue how important the genomic DNA is in determining both similarities and differences between species. You are way behind the times my friend.

==Do you think the authors were similarly “trapped by (their) reductionist understanding of the role of DNA”.

Yes!

==Were the authors the victim of a “slovenly commitment to reductionist materialism”?

Yes, it’s obvious...except to Temple of Darwin fanatics.

==The inescapable conclusion of their data is that humans and chimps diverged more recently than gorillas.

How many times are you going to get this wrong before it finally dawns on you that your materialist brethren are now saying that it is possible that humans and chimps diverged from apes but not from each other? Good grief!

==Do you see fit to correct them on their own data, and based upon what exactly?

Yes, not even their data isn’t their own. It is on loan from God. And the data points to common design, not common descent. Don’t worry, I have a feeling you too will be able to see the obvious soon, because I’m praying for you. In fact, I’m thinking of tapping some people from my church to pray for you as well. “Wherever two or three are gathered together in my name...”


339 posted on 12/02/2008 11:32:30 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson