[Tarpon]

My favorite part -—

“The majority opinion in Roe v. Wade for example, never even quoted the Constitutional clause that the Court used to reach it’s sweeping opinion”

I wonder why that is?

So we have a right that isn’t there, and it is not to be fiddled with at all, and a right that is there and it can be trampled at will. I wonder why that is?

[MrB]

Simple.

Leftist judges aren’t where they are in order to apply the law to the case.
They, and any leftist in journalism or academia (you name it), are there in order to mold society as they see fit.

Don’t expect any “consistency” of ruling from leftist judges, you’ll drive yourself nuts trying to force consistency on them. The only consistency you’ll get is the advancement of liberalism/collectivism/anti-individualism/anti-traditionalism.

They go into a case with a pre-determined social outcome in mind, and then spend all their time searching for justification of the ruling they must make in order to achieve that outcome.

[pray4liberty]

So we have a right that isn’t there, and it is not to be fiddled with at all, and a right that is there and it can be trampled at will. I wonder why that is?

Seems like our corrupt politicians can't tell the difference.