Would it be fair to say the only 'official' record of Obama's previous life is his version as outlined in his two books?
If so, we have no reason to trust this guy. Period.
Would it be fair to say that nearly every document chronicling Obama's past, e.g., his Birth Certificate, his college and law school transcripts, his involvement with the Annenberg Foundation, etc., has been "sealed" by various judges?It is not fair since you are mostly mistaken or misinformed. The governor of Hawaii "sealed" the birth record, but only because Hawaiian law restricts release of birth certificates to persons of certain relationship. The Hawaiian court refused to order release of the certificate because the appellant lacked standing, if I understand the ruling correctly.
Transcripts are available generally only to the student, or upon the student's request - with the student's written permission - to third parties. That is not a matter of law in most cases. It is usually school policy. It is Harvard's policy.
Facts regarding O's involvement with Annenberg was published in a series of posts at Hugh Hewitt's blog. That the MSM did not investigate what was available was incompetent, but MSM had its agenda. The Annenberg records were not "sealed" by a court order.
I do not trust O, but it is because he was a blank slate reflecting whatever anyone wanted to believe him to be. But this birth certificate stuff is nonsense, equivalent to secret assertions about flying saucers landing in Brooklyn. It makes this conservative blog appear equivalent to KOS wackos who suffer from BDS, and that is sad.